Goodbye, Ulysses

You Served Well

https://i0.wp.com/science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/images/northpole/Ulysses_spacecraft.jpg?resize=389%2C292Back when I was in graduate school (in the last century, and I can say that without feeling TOO old), I worked on a team that used data from the Ulysses spacecraft to study the effects of the solar wind on comet plasma tails. Ulysses has been following an orbit that took it over the poles of the Sun, allowing the spacecraft’s instruments to sample every “regime” of the solar wind.

Now, unless you study the Sun, you probably don’t think about this, but it doesn’t blow its wind evenly in all directions. The speed and density (think of it as “loadedness” because it carries particles along) are not the same at each latitude.  In the Sun’s “midsection” (its mid-latitudes) the wind is heavily loaded (it’s more dense) and blows at an average speed of 450 km/sec. (970,000 miles per hour).  At higher latitudes (the closer you get to the poles) the wind is much less dense and blows out at around 750 km/sec. (1.6 million miles per hour). And of course, there are locally gusty conditions where winds can temporarily go faster.

What we were trying to do was correlate the appearance of a comet’s plasma tail to what latitude of the solar wind it was experiencing. A plasma tail is very sensitive to the solar wind and responds almost instantly to any changes. So, what we found (with the help of the Ulysses spacecraft) was that at equatorial latitudes, the plasma tail of a comet experiencing this part of the solar wind has a distinctly disturbed appearance. It varies over time and actually experiences what we called “disconnection events” (where the plasma tail breaks off and floats away) as it experiences reversals of the magnetic field at those latitudes.

When the same comet travels through the polar latitudes, it encounters that steady, less-dense and faster solar wind. It has smaller variations in speed and density, no magnetic field reversals, and no disconnection events. A plasma tail looks pretty boring at the higher latitudes (by contrast to its often disrupted, kinky appearance at mid-latitudes).  What we found was that the comet, by acting as a “solar wind sock,” can be used to map the conditions in different latitudes of the solar wind. And Ulysses gave us exquisite readings of wind conditions from its vantage point in the solar wind — which then allowed us almost to “predict” what the comet would look like when it encountered those conditions. Or, to take it another way, we could look at a picture of a comet and just about tell you where it was in the solar wind and we used Ulysses data to back it up.

It was fascinating work, and Ulysses performed well for us — even though our project was just one small one out of many that took advantage of this spacecraft’s work. It’s been a good run for Ulysses, and the news today that it will be switched off on July 1 is sad, but inevitable. The spacecraft has held up four times longer than originally expected, but its onboard generators are starting to fail (along with some other issues). It will likely be taking data right up to the end, and I think that’s a fitting tribute for a well-run, high-productivity mission.

You’re Not Just a Dwarf Planet…

You’re a Plutoid

After two years of what must have been grueling discussion, the International Astronomical Union has decided that things that are like Pluto (which used to be defined as a planet) are now going to be called “Plutoids” as long as they orbit at or beyond the orbit of Neptune. Dwarf planets (as a small-body definition), as you may recall, was an outcome of the 2006 IAU meeting, when it was decided that we needed a new category for worlds that aren’t quite planets, but are bigger than asteroids. The name plutoid for a specific subset of dwarf planets was proposed by the members of the IAU Committee on Small Body Nomenclature (CSBN), accepted by the Board of Division III, by the IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN) and approved by the IAU Executive Committee at its recent meeting in Oslo, Norway.

Two Plutoids: Pluto (shown with its companion Charon) and Eris (with Dysnomia)

So, what are the characteristics of Plutoids? They have to be celestial bodies in orbit around the Sun at a distance greater than that of Neptune. They must have sufficient mass for their self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that they assume a hydrostatic equilibrium (near-spherical) shape. And, they haven’t cleared the neighborhood (of debris) around their orbit. So, Pluto and Eris fit this definition, and scientists expect more small worlds like them to be found as astronomers keep finding them out the great beyond.

By this definition, the dwarf planet Ceres is NOT a Plutoid, but it’s still a dwarf planet. This is because its orbit is within the asteroid belt and not transneptunian.