An Interesting Use of Facts

The Planetarium Projector Funds Never Got Out of Committee

As reported on Politifact, the funding that Mr. McCain says Mr. Obama voted for to help Adler to get a 40-year-old projection system replaced (NOT an overhead projector) was never allowed past the Senate Appropriations Committee. Mr. Obama did request the earmark, as was his right as a Senator (and Mr. McCain has requested quite a bit of money over the years, too).

So, Mr. McCain’s question, “do we need to spend that kind of money” is more rhetorical and just kinda glosses over the fact that the money was asked for but that appropriation request didn’t pass.  Kinda disingenuous of Mr. McCain to overlook that last part, you betcha. By golly.

The sad thing is that these facts could have been gleaned by Mr. McCain’s prep team if they’d bother to read the Congressional Record (paid for and made available by taxpayer dollars).  But they didn’t. So, the debate tactic of calling his opponent out on funding for a planetarium system that will benefit millions is an interesting one-sided use of facts and inferences, ignores an important point, and really just is a foul shot.

Once again it’s fair to ask: if Mr. McCain’s handlers got this one wrong, what else are they getting wrong?

Thanks to Mark for digging up the Politifact link.

UPDATE:

Here’s a statement from Adler Planetarium

STATEMENT ABOUT SENATOR JOHN McCAIN’S

COMMENTS AT THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

Last night, during the presidential debate in Nashville, Tennessee, Senator John McCain made the following statement:

McCain: “While we were working to eliminate these pork barrel earmarks he (Senator Obama) voted for nearly $1 billion in pork barrel earmark projects. Including $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois. My friends, do we need to spend that kind of money?”

To clarify, the Adler Planetarium requested federal support – which was not funded – to replace the projector in its historic Sky Theater, the first planetarium theater in the Western Hemisphere. The Adler’s Zeiss Mark VI projector – not an overhead projector – is the instrument that re-creates the night sky in a dome theater, the quintessential planetarium experience. The Adler’s projector is nearly 40 years old and is no longer supported with parts or service by the manufacturer. It is only the second planetarium projector in the Adler’s 78 years of operation.

Science literacy is an urgent issue in the United States. To remain competitive and ensure national security, it is vital that we educate and inspire the next generation of explorers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math.

Senator McCain’s statements about the Adler Planetarium’s request for federal support do not accurately reflect the museum’s legislative history or relationship with Senator Obama. The Adler has approached the Illinois Congressional delegation the last few years for federal assistance with various initiatives. These have included museum exhibitions, equipment and educational programs we offer to area schools, including the Chicago Public Schools. We have made requests to Senators Durbin and Obama, as well as to 6 area Congressmen from both political parties. We are grateful that all of the Members we have approached, including Senator Obama, have deemed our activities worthy of their support, and have made appropriations requests on our behalf, as they have for many worthy Illinois nonprofit organizations.

As a result of the hard work of our bipartisan congressional delegation, the Adler has been fortunate to receive a few federal appropriations the past couple of years. However, the Adler has never received an earmark as a result of Senator Obama’s efforts. This is clearly evidenced by recent transparency laws implemented by the Congress, which have resulted in the names of all requesting Members being listed next to every earmark in the reports that accompany appropriations bills.

*****

Update 2: Here’s a link to a great article by my friend Jim Sweitzer — he writes about the Adler from his POV as someone who spent a long time working at Adler as an astrophysicist and now advises other facilities. Welcome to the fray, Jim!

Update 3:  A friend just pointed me to this great discussion at DailyKos (some comments are a bit salty).

(CCP here again —  U.S. citizens — have you registered to vote?)

One thought on “An Interesting Use of Facts”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.