Staring at Galaxies

Looking for Star-forming Regions

NGC 253 with inset of star-forming regions as seen by the NACO instrument on the Very Large Telescope.
NGC 253 as seen with the Wide-field Imager on the MPG 2.2-meter telescope at La Silla, Chile; the inset shows star-forming regions as seen by the NACO instrument on the Very Large Telescope.

Want to see places where stars are being born?  Easy. Just look for clouds of gas and dust called stellar nurseries. Tis is easier said than done, though.  Such regions aren’t always easy to study in detail, especially if we want to see them in distant galaxies through our blurry, ever-changing atmosphere.

To get around this problem, astronomers at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias in Spain used an adaptive optics instrument on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile to zero in on 37 small, bright star-forming regions at the core of the galaxy NGC 253.  This galaxy, which lies somewhere around 13 million light-years away from us, is one of the brightest — and dustiest — spirals in the sky.

NGC 253 is about 70,000 light-years across and we see it nearly edge-on from our Earth-based point of view.

A closeup of 37 active stellar nurseries in the heart of galaxy NGC 253.
A closeup of 37 active stellar nurseries in the heart of galaxy NGC 253.

The core of this galaxy is bright with places where stars are being born — possibly as many as a hundred thousand massive young stars bursting into light. Astronomers have also found evidence that this galactic center also harbors a supermassive black hole similar to the one that lurks in the heart of the Milky Way Galaxy.

This might seem rather a dangerous place for star nurseries to be churning out young stars, since the neighborhood of a black hole is a pretty violent one. The gravitational forces alone can shred clouds of gas and dust, making it pretty difficult for material to condense to form stars. But, even near the core of our own Milky Way, astronomers have found evidence of stellar nurseries, cranking out massive young stars many times the mass of our own Sun. Granted, they don’t  live as long as the Sun, but they ARE forming.

The best way to understand these processes is to study them in as many places in as many galaxies (including our own) as we can. The evidence will eventually help astronomers understand more of the mechanics of star birth wherever it occurs.

Stuff Hits Earth: News at 11

Fireball Over Sweden

Meteor Fireball in Sweden (Courtesy www.meteoritesusa.com)
Meteor Fireball in Sweden (Courtesy www.meteoritesusa.com, http://nachrichten.t-online.de/c/17/40/62/72/17406272.html, and sydsvenskan.se))

Last night (January 17) a fireball lit up the skies over Malmö, Sweden and was seen by people in Germany and the Netherlands. You can see a security camera view of the event here. It looks pretty spectacular and no doubt anybody who saw it was probably quite surprised and shocked.

Now the object at the heart of this fireball was probably a chunk of rock that broke up and scattered its pieces to the ground as it blasted through our atmosphere. There aren’t (yet) any reports of damage, and I imagine meteorite hunters will be swarming around suspected impact sites to gather evidence.

Stuff coming in from space is a pretty common occurrence on our planet. Most of it is dust-particle-sized or maybe the size of peas, and those pieces tend to burn up high above the surface and leave behind glowing trails. That’s usually what we see during a meteor storm.

Speaking in general terms, larger stuff (rock-sized and a bit larger) creates bolides, like the one that flared over Sweden last night.  Most of the time these just break up and scatter out, leaving behind lots of cool smaller rocks for meteorite hunters to collect.

The largest material is what scientists worry about — those are typically tens of meters across and larger.  That’s not what Swedes and others saw last night. I’m taking about things the size of houses or small mountains can do some real damage to Earth’s surface, including gouging out craters and  slamming into populated areas. In the worst-case scenarios — like impacts of objects at least 1 kilometer across and larger — those actions could disrupt the atmosphere and perturb our global climate.  One of these large impactors could create so much damage that global temperatures could plunge, leading to crop damage and destruction, and societal breakdowns. According to the folks at NASA’s Ames Research Center Impact group (led by astronomer David Morrison), studies have been done that suggest that the minimum mass of an impacting body that would produce global consequences is several tens of billions of tons. An object with that much mass would set off a groundburst explosion with enough energy to equal a million megatons of TNT. The only thing worse than that would be nuclear war (unless we had several hits of that size).

Compared to that, last night’s bolide is a mere “plinker”.

Thanks to Daniel Fischer of Cosmos4U and the Cosmic Mirror for passing along news of the Sweden bolide.