TheSpacewriter

  • About TheSpacewriter
  • Voice-overs, Videos, and ‘Casts
  • 365 Days of Astronomy!
  • The Spacewriter’s Store
  • Blog


These pages chronicle the work and ruminations of Carolyn Collins Petersen, also known as TheSpacewriter.

qrcode

I am CEO of Loch Ness Productions. I am also a producer for Astrocast.TV, an online magazine about astronomy and space science.

For the past few years, I've also been a voice actor, appearing in a variety of productions. You can see and hear samples of my work by clicking on the "Voice-Overs, Videos and 'Casts tab.

My blog, TheSpacewriter's Ramblings, is about astronomy, space science, and other sciences.


Ideas and opinions expressed here do not represent those of my employer or of any other organization to which I am affiliated. They're mine.

 Subscribe in a reader

Visit my main site at: TheSpacewriter.com.

**Comments are welcome; I do moderate them to weed out spam.

Contact me for writing and voice-over projects at: cc(dot)petersen(at)gmail(dot)com

I Twitter as Spacewriter

Blog entry posting times are U.S. Mountain Time (GMT-6:00) All postings Copyright 2003-2011 C.C. Petersen

Find online and local Astronomy
Astronomy | Add your site

Spacewriter’s Recent Posts

  • A UFO? A Plane? What is It?
  • Planet Viewing
  • Double Your Viewing
  • Super Moon? Super What?
  • Sic Venus Transit Solis
  • Hurray, Hurray, the First of May
  • Dwarfs in the Cosmos

Archives

  • ► 2012 (28)
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
  • ► 2011 (107)
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
  • ► 2010 (95)
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
  • ► 2009 (225)
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
  • ► 2008 (291)
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • ► 2007 (114)
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
  • ► 2006 (72)
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
  • ► 2005 (56)
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
  • ► 2004 (96)
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
  • ► 2003 (74)
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • January 2003
  • ► 2002 (21)
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • August 2002
    • June 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002

Calendar

February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728


Add to Google







Like space music?

Check out my favorite space music artist: Geodesium at Geodesium.com


Blogroll

  • 21st Century Waves - Technology Booms and Human Expansion Into the Cosmos
  • About.Com Space/Astronomy
  • Adot’s NotBlog
  • Astroengine.com
  • Astronomy Blog
  • Astronomy Cast
  • Badastronomy.Com
  • Blooloop
  • BLooloop: CCP
  • Captain Disillusion
  • ChandraBlog - Chandra X-ray Telescope
  • Cosmic Log
  • Cosmic Mirror
  • Cosmic Variance
  • Cosmos4u
  • Discovery Space
  • DP’s Astronomy Blog
  • EurekAlert
  • European Southern Observatory
  • Friends of the Griffith Observatory
  • Gemini Observatory
  • Griffith Observatory
  • Hairy Museum of Natural History
  • Hubble Space Telescope
  • Kids Directory
  • Loch Ness Productions - Cosmic content
  • Mike Brown’s Planets
  • MIT/Haystack Observatory
  • MWA Vodcast
  • NASA Climate Change
  • National Public Radio
  • Observing the Sky
  • One Astronomer’s Noise
  • Pharyngula
  • Prince of Pithy
  • Science Made Cool
  • Significant Snail
  • Solar System Watch
  • Space Times News
  • Space Weather FX Vodcasts
  • Star Stryder
  • Stop Unethical Recission
  • String Theory
  • The Daily Galaxy
  • The Mathroom (possibly NSFW)
  • The Meridiani Journal
  • The Planetary Society Blog
  • The Way Things Break
  • TheCrotchetyoldfan
  • Truth
  • Understanding Science
  • Universe Today

Other blogs that link to me.




Listed on BlogShares

The Eye of the Helix



February 25, 2009 at 13:35 pm | Leave a Comment

Look Deep

The Helix Nebula as seen by the European Southern Observatory. (Click to embiggify.)

The Helix Nebula as seen by the European Southern Observatory. (Click to embiggify.)

Well this is just stunning.  The Helix Nebula is a planetary nebula that lies about 700 light-years away from us. It’s what’s left over after a star like the Sun goes through its death throes and blows off much of its atmosphere to surrounding space. If you could float through the material to the central portion, you’d pass through shells of gas that were “exhaled” by the star. And, in the center would be the hot remnant of the old star, shining brightly in visible and ultraviolet light.

This image from the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope is full of detail in the surrounding clouds. For example, you can see little “blobs” of material that astronomers call “cometary knots”  — not because they’re comets (they’re not) but because they seem to have faint tails extending away from central blobs, pointing away from the star.

If you click on the image above you’ll get an enlarged version.  Look carefully at the central section of the nebula — you should be able to see galaxies in there!  The galaxies aren’t IN the nebula — they’re behind it, and the veil of gas is so thin that you can see much more distant objects right through it!

Go explore the eye of the  Helix — it’s gorgeous!  Want more information? Click here for the press release and links to zoom-in animations of the Helix.






OCO Lost



February 24, 2009 at 11:02 am | 4 Comments

Lost Chance to Measure Atmospheric Carbon

The launch of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (courtesy NASA).

The launch of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (courtesy NASA).

The news today about the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) failed to reach orbit and crashed into the ocean near Antartica is just too ironic. The OCO (the acronym is also a play on the chemical formula for carbon dioxide, CO2) was built to measure places where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed on and around our planet. Antarctica is one of the bellweather places on Earth that atmospheric scientists study as they chart the effects of global warming. OCO would have taken measurements 30,000 times per orbit, including the atmosphere over Antarctica. That’s the kind of fine detail that scientists need in order to understand and model the complexity of our atmosphere as it soaks up more and more carbon dioxide.

This is a huge loss.  How is it that a fairing — the part that protects the payload on the way up out of Earth’s gravity well — could fail?  Human error?  Part failure?  Did a computer command fail?  No matter how it was caused, the loss of this satellite affects not just the scientists involved, but students who had designed experiments using the satellite, and — really — all of us.

Antarctica, from a NASA animation.

Antarctica, from a NASA animation.

Humans and our activities are the primary causes of excessive carbon dioxide levels in our atmosphere. That CO2 is part of the chain of events that are causing global warming. We need things like the OCO to help us understand the distribution, production, and absorption of CO2 if we are to make any definitive steps toward reducing the CO2 amounts we are pouring out each day from our automobiles, factories, power plants, and other polluting technologies. OCO is part of a larger effort to study and understand our planet — something we also do at other planets in order to understand their histories and environments. I hope that a replacement can be made for OCO — the knowledge it would have given us is information that we need.






Where Do Babies Come From?*



February 23, 2009 at 13:12 pm | Leave a Comment

*Baby Dwarf Galaxies, That Is

In the 13.7-billion-year-long history of the universe, we know that galaxies had to come from somewhere, right?  It’s obvious that they were born, and we’re sitting inside one. And, since we can look out across great distances and see further back in time), you’d think we would be able to find galaxy “babies”. But, explaining the processes involved in galaxy building and observing them in action has been difficult. Part of the problem is that the galaxy formation section of our universe (if you want to think of it that way) is pretty far distant from us. That makes it tough to “see” unless you can look at galaxy birthplaces in different wavelengths of light.

The Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX, a project run by NASA) looked out at the galaxy birthing fields  in the universe with ultraviolet eyes and turned up some pretty interesting action. Specifically, scientists using GALEX identified dwarf galaxies being born in clouds of pristine gas that could well have been left over from the creation of the universe itself.

Forming dwarf galaxes shine in ultraviolet light, as seen by the GALEX mission. The clumps (circles) are the dwarf galaxies found by the mission. (Click to embiggen.)

Forming dwarf galaxies shine in ultraviolet light (objects in circles) as seen by the GALEX mission. The circled clumps are the dwarf galaxies found by the mission. Visible-light data (white) comes from the Digitized Sky Survey (STScI). The blue overlay comes from radio data provided by Arecibo Observatory. (Click to embiggen.)

They found unexpected new galaxies forming inside the Leo Ring, a huge cloud of hydrogen and helium that seems to hover around two huge galaxies in the constellation Leo. The whole complex lies around 35 million light-years away from us.

The cloud, which lies about 35 million light-years away from us, was first identified about 25 years ago in radio astronomy data. It’s not something you can see in visible light through an optical telescope.  Astronomers have tried exploring this ring, and all they found was gas. No stars of any kind could be seen at optical or radio wavelengths.  But, the GALEX satellite, with its ultraviolet light sensitivity found evidence of recent massive star formation in this region.

So, what’s the “smoking gun” signature of star formation in this ring? The ultraviolet signature of young stars is clearly seen coming from several clumps of gas within the Leo Ring.  Astronomer David Thilker of Johns Hopkins University thinks they’re dwarf galaxies.  “We speculate that these young stellar complexes are dwarf galaxies, although, as previously shown by radio astronomers, the gaseous clumps forming these galaxies lack dark matter,” he said. “Almost all other galaxies we know are dominated by dark matter, which acted as a seed for the collection of their luminous components — stars, gas and dust. What we see occurring in the Leo Ring is a new mode for the formation of dwarf galaxies in material remaining from the much earlier assembly of this galaxy group.”

Because they lack dark matter, these new galaxies astronomers are seeing in the Leo Ring resemble tidal dwarf galaxies (the kind that condense out of gas recycled from other galaxies), but  there’s an important difference. The gaseous material making up tidal dwarfs is rich with metals and elements that could only have been created inside stars.  The Leo Ring dwarfs are made of much more pristine material that doesn’t have ANY metals in it. Which means that no stars formed to “pollute” the gas making up the Leo Ring dwarfs.  Which gives astronomers a rare and new chance to study star formation in gases that are pristine leftovers from the creation of the universe.  There may have been a lot of these “pure” gas clouds early in universal history. As astronomers look farther out in space and further back in time with instruments like GALEX, they may find more of these baby galaxies being born.

You can get more information and images here about these baby galaxies and the GALEX mission.






« Newest entries — Older entries »

Powered by WordPress

This blog a wholly pwnd subsidiary of Carolyn Collins Petersen, a.k.a. TheSpacewriter.
Copyright 2008, Carolyn Collins Petersen
Inama Nushif!
Image of Horsehead Nebula: T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF) and Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA/NASA)

“It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion. It is by the juice of bean that coffee acquires depth, the tongue acquires taste, the taste awakens the body. It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion.”

Spam prevention powered by Akismet

Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.13