BIG BANG A BUST
The Galaxy Spin Theory
Copyright 2009 by Jeffrey P. Mitchell

Throughout history the scientific community; though having done much good, has made erroneous assumptions that appear ridiculous today. The two biggest would be the flat earth theory, and the belief that the earth is at the center of the universe. Along with these is the belief in the Big Bang.
There was no Big Bang. The universe as we know it is not expanding or contracting, but relative constant. What is happening is that: like satellites around planets, and planets around stars and stars circling in their galaxy; the galaxies themselves are orbiting around a central core. This is the “Galaxy Spin Theory”.
The Big Bang theory is based on four premises. (1)There is cosmic background radiation (2) most of the galaxies are going away from each other (their light being red shifted) (3) there is an abundance of lighter materials (4) and the universe is homogenous and isotropic.
After trillions of years of stars being born, stars dying, quasars, and all the other energy production it would be surprising if there weren’t cosmic background radiation. The temperature of this radiation does not prove in any way that there was a Big Bang.
Most galaxies are red shifted, but not because they are receding from each other. Their light coming to us has been bent after millions and billions of years by the gravity of the central core. Galaxies are actually physically closer than they appear.
That there is an abundance of lighter materials is only logical, and proves nothing.
The belief that the universe is homogenous and isotropic is discredited by numerous observations including: millions of galaxies flying off toward the Great Attractor.
The Big Bang theory relies heavily on dark matter and dark energy. If no dark matter how are the anomalies we see explained? If no dark energy, how can all the galaxies be accelerating? The Galaxy Spin Theory unlike the Big Bang Theory does not rely on dark matter and dark energy. In fact it disposes of them.
The anomalies currently attributed to dark matter are only illusions caused by the bending of light. It is this same gravitational red-shifting that accounts for there being so few observable blue shift galaxies.

This diagram shows the positions of the galaxies as they are, and as we see them. The light we receive from galaxy “A” has been distorted by galaxy “B” but we do not see them as being in the same line of sight.

It’s like we are looking through a fish-eye lens. You can take all your measurements through this distorted lens but none of those measurements mean a thing in real life. Even the stars in the Milky Way will be bending the light coming from other galaxies. If someone looks through a telescope and remarks “that is where the galaxy was a billion years ago”; that is a fallacy. That galaxy was never where it appears in the sky.
The Galaxies are not actually accelerating but only appear to be in relation to our own galaxy. This can be illustrated by two cars on the freeway going the same speed. Because they are going the same speed there appears to be no acceleration in relation to each other. However if one car takes the off ramp; even though he is moving at the same speed as before, it appears to the other car now to be accelerating. All galaxies in their respective orbits are on their own off ramp, seeming to each other to be accelerating even though they are going there normal orbital speed.

To believe in the Big Bang one is obligated to embrace the wondrous singularity that magically appeared and then magically expanded. (No explanations given). You must accept as a given the baffling dark matter and bewildering dark energy. (Again, no explanations given).
To believe in the Galaxy Spin theory you must believe that light is bent by gravity. The bending of light was proven by Albert Einstein and Sir Arthur Eddington in 1919.

I call the galaxies central core Tipperary because it is a long, long way to go. I call the galaxy spin entity a Whirly (you have to call it something.) I call ours the S.R.T.E. Whirly. Are there other Whirlies out there? Logically.
Any response to this would be welcome at galaxyspin@yahoo.com, and I have a early presentation of my theory on Youtube http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZpROFfeh0

Not only that, but your argument is making little sense. What’s your background in this?