
These pages chronicle the work and ruminations of Carolyn Collins Petersen, also known as TheSpacewriter.
I am CEO of Loch Ness Productions. I am also a producer for Astrocast.TV, an online magazine about astronomy and space science.
For the past few years, I've also been a voice actor, appearing in a variety of productions. You can see and hear samples of my work by clicking on the "Voice-Overs, Videos and 'Casts tab.
My blog, TheSpacewriter's Ramblings, is about astronomy, space science, and other sciences.
Ideas and opinions expressed here do not represent those of my employer or of any other organization to which I am affiliated. They're mine.
Visit my main site at: TheSpacewriter.com.
**I encourage comments and discussion; please keep it polite and respectful. I do moderate them to weed out spam, but I also refuse to post any messages that contain harassing, demeaning, rude, or profane language. I run a respectable establishment here.
Contact me for writing and voice-over projects at: cc(dot)petersen(at)gmail(dot)com
I Twitter as Spacewriter
Blog entry posting times are U.S. Mountain Time (GMT-6:00) All postings Copyright 2003-2011 C.C. Petersen
Spacewriter’s Recent Posts
- Writing about Astronomy
- The End of the Kepler Mission?
- Using the Sky
- A Little Solar Activity
- All Hail Albertus Alauda
- Hubble Spots Comet ISON
- The Once and Future Universe
Archives
- ► 2013 (34)
- ► 2012 (78)
- ► 2011 (107)
- ► 2010 (95)
- ► 2009 (225)
- ► 2008 (291)
- ► 2007 (114)
- ► 2006 (72)
- ► 2005 (56)
- ► 2004 (96)
- ► 2003 (74)
- ► 2002 (21)
Calendar
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
Like space music?
Check out my favorite
space music artist:
Geodesium
at Geodesium.com
Blogroll
- 21st Century Waves - Technology Booms and Human Expansion Into the Cosmos
- About.Com Space/Astronomy
- Adot’s NotBlog
- Astroengine.com
- Astronomy Blog
- Astronomy Cast
- Badastronomy.Com
- Blooloop
- BLooloop: CCP
- Captain Disillusion
- ChandraBlog - Chandra X-ray Telescope
- Cosmic Log
- Cosmic Mirror
- Cosmic Variance
- Cosmos4u
- Discovery Space
- DP’s Astronomy Blog
- EurekAlert
- European Southern Observatory
- Friends of the Griffith Observatory
- Gemini Observatory
- Griffith Observatory
- Hairy Museum of Natural History
- Hubble Space Telescope
- Kids Directory
- Loch Ness Productions - Cosmic content
- Loch Ness Productions on Facebook - the world’s foremost fulldome video producer for planetarium shows
- Mike Brown’s Planets
- MIT/Haystack Observatory
- MWA Vodcast
- NASA Climate Change
- National Public Radio
- Observing the Sky
- One Astronomer’s Noise
- Pharyngula
- Prince of Pithy
- Science Made Cool
- Significant Snail
- Solar System Watch
- Space Times News
- Space Weather FX Vodcasts
- Star Stryder
- Stop Unethical Recission
- String Theory
- The Daily Galaxy
- The Mathroom (possibly NSFW)
- The Meridiani Journal
- The Planetary Society Blog
- The Way Things Break
- TheCrotchetyoldfan
- Truth
- Understanding Science
- Universe Today
Planetary Habitability
June 28, 2010 at 8:30 am | 1 Comment
What Does it Mean?
In my last blog entry, I talked about oceans on ancient Mars and the evidence for them that planetary scientists are finding in craters on the Red Planet. All the questions about water on Mars really point to a big question about habitability — that is, a world’s capability of sustaining life. There’s a sort of rote list of things that planetary scientists recite when it comes to assessing what a world has to support living beings. It has to have water, warmth, and organic material (food, essentially) for the life to exist. Those things are important for habitability. So, if Mars had water in the distant past, and if it had warmth (from volcanism or heating from its core or if it had an atmosphere that could trap heat), then two of the three conditions for life would have been met. Food — organic material — would be a simple chemical problem to solve. Here on Earth, food for life ranges from the stuff you and I eat every day to the needs of such one-celled beings as bacteria that munch on sulfur. Obviously, early Mars didn’t have gourmet delights that we could eat, but it could well have had plenty of delicacies for one-celled organisms. So, the planet could have been habitable. If we decided to live there in the future, it could still be termed habitable, but only just barely and we’d have to bring along habitats to take advantage of the barely habitable landscape. But, it could be done. And, it likely will be done.
So, we know Earth is habitable (still). And, Mars was and could be. But, what about Venus? You know, that beautifully bright starlike object that’s making a nightly curtain call in our western skies after sunset? Yeah, that one. It’s gorgeous to look at, but if you landed on Venus, you’d fry in an instant, if you weren’t crushed to death first by the hellishly heavy and hot atmosphere. So, how could this volcanic, sulfurous world be habitable? Clearly it isn’t right now, but it may have been in the past.

What early Venus could have looked like. Could it have had a water ocean? Or was it more likely a molten world with a wet atmosphere? What happened to it? Credit: J. Whatmore.
Scientists at the European Space Agency are operators for the Venus Express orbiter, which has sent back data suggesting very strongly that early Venus could have water — perhaps even an ocean of it — and may have begun its planetary life as a much more Earthlike world. The spacecraft measured the escape of molecules of hydrogen and oxygen from Venus out to space. The rate of escape of hydrogen is roughly twice that of oxygen, and this indicates that water is the source of these escaping materials. There’s also a tracer element called deuterium that also tells scientists that water has been escaping the planet. Deuterium is a heavy form of hydrogen, and it would have more difficulty escaping the planet’s gravitational pull. The presence of large amounts of it in the upper atmosphere of Venus tells us that water has also escaped and left the deuterium behind.
It’s probably unlikely that Venus had Earthlike oceans as shown in the artist’s concept above. If it did have standing water, those pools and/or small oceans could have been formed when comets slammed into the molten surface. If that happened, and if conditions were right, Venus could have been habitable for a short time in its early history. If that’s true, then it begs the question of whether life could have arisen on the planet, only to be snuffed out by Venus’s subsequent changing climate. It’s an interesting idea and one that needs to be explored more.
However, the more likely scenario is that the newborn Venus had no oceans, but sported a very wet atmosphere overlying the molten surface. Over time, sunlight broke the water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen (a process known as “photodissociation”). The newly freed gases fled to space, leaving behind the deuterium. The escape process cooled things down enough, and the surface cooled.
There’s still a lot of “ifs” in these scenarios, but the evidence for water (past and present) is strong, based on the Venus Express data. It’s a good hint that the Venus we see today — hot, arid, miserable, and volcanic — wasn’t always this way. And, it adds more to our store of knowledge about just when a planet can be habitable in its history — provided the conditions are right.
Stay tuned!
Wet Mars
June 26, 2010 at 13:53 pm | Leave a Comment
The Proof is in the Craters

Lyot Crater on Mars, with lines indicating data swaths taken by the Mars Express OMEGA sensor, and NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter CRISM instrument data.. The stars show where hydrated mineerals have been detected. Credits: NASA/ESA/JPL-Caltech/JHU-APL/IAS.
A neat piece of news caught my eye this week — an announcement from the European Space Agency that mineral studies of Mars taken by ESA’s Mars Express mission and NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Mission show that liquid water was once very widespread on Mars. The evidence lies inside craters spread around the planet, apparently just beneath the surface. It’s in the form of deposits of what are called hydrated silicates — minerals that have been in contact with water sometime in the past.
Lyot Crater (at left) was one of 91 impact craters the missions studied in a search for evidence of water. At least nine of the craters have strong evidence of hydrated silicates. Those minerals form in wet environments either on the surface or underground — and they have now been identified in both the north and south parts of Mars.
Why study craters? Because the impacting objects (asteroid chunks, for example) punched down through the surface of the planet and exposed very ancient surface crust that would have been in contact with water. This means that water was widespread on the Martian surface sometime in the past. This is great news for scientists who are working to understand the role that water played on Mars early in its history. The presence of water means that conditions could have been favorable for life. It doesn’t prove that life existed on Mars — that takes other studies and will very likely require us to visit the planet to prove it for sure. But, the existence of water is a big thing. There are hints of it all over Mars, not just in the hydrated silicates, but in the landforms that seem to be carved by the action of water. This is a fascinating story that is still unfolding for planetary scientists. I, for one, think that we’ll find substantial reservoirs of water (probably locked away in subsurface aquifers and permafrost) on Mars when our first explorers set foot on that dry and dusty desert surface.
Got Dark Skies?
June 22, 2010 at 16:54 pm | Leave a Comment
If not, Find out How You Can Get Them
Every night I get to go outside and look up at dark skies. It’s a consequence of where I live — in a rural location devoid of much of the light pollution associated with modern, urban life. As a result, I get to see dark night skies the way our ancestors did — in fact, the way most people on Earth saw the skies until the invention of electric lights and their widespread use outdoors. Amazingly enough, everybody had decent dark skies up until the turn of the 19th century into the 20th. Sure, there were gaslights in some cities, but their effect was nothing like the millions of watts that now get sent skyward by our combined world-wide lighting fixture collection.
Want to learn more about light pollution and its effects on us and the life forms around us? Check out this new three-minute video from McDonald Observatory. It could change the way you view light pollution and the dark skies.
Also, considering joining and supporting the International Dark-Sky Association. This group has done a lot to help people save money and the environment by employing well designed lighting. Their web pages are packed with useful and money-saving ideas to help us use our lighting resources more carefully. In an era where oil spills decorate our news pages and TV broadcasts, and depletion of energy resources is now a household term, looking for ways to use our energy supplies is a wise solution. It also returns to many humans something they haven’t seen for a long time: the beautiful night sky.
Older entries »
This blog a wholly pwnd subsidiary of Carolyn Collins Petersen, a.k.a. TheSpacewriter.
Copyright 2013, Carolyn Collins Petersen
Inama Nushif!
Image of Horsehead Nebula: T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF) and Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA/NASA)
“It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion. It is by the juice of bean that coffee acquires depth, the tongue acquires taste, the taste awakens the body. It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion.”
Spam prevention powered by Akismet
