OMG, My Life is Ruined! My Astrological Sign is Wrong!

Astrology is Bunk

Oh wow.  Can we get a life for all those folks who are COMPLETELY up in arms because they just NOW found out something that astronomers and all other sensible people have known for centuries: that astrological signs do not line up with the constellations they purportedly represent. This story hit the news a few days ago, and you would think that the world was ending judging by the panicked reactions of those whose lives are measured by little boxes of BS that appear as “astrological advice” in newspapers and magazines.

Folks, astrology is bunk.  I said it up there.  And I’ll say it again. Astrology is bunk.  It doesn’t work. It is a parlor game, a shell game, a way for people who otherwise don’t have any visible means of support to take your money and pretend to tell your future, etc.  It has NO basis in science, in reality, and shouldn’t have any meaning for you other than as fascinating historical oddity dating back to the time when people were superstitious, ignorant of reality, and willing to believe anything… not like now, right?

oh…. wait…

Logic cleanup in aisle three, please!

If you want to know why astrology doesn’t work, let’s start with the fact that, yes, the astrological signs (made up by ancient shamans who had very little understanding of physical processes but who, even in prehistory, had found a way to make mystical BS pay) don’t line up with the constellations they’re supposedly named for.  That’s explained by an entirely measurable and predictable process called precession, which you can read about here (and the first paragraph explains it pretty well, along with the moving graphic).

Then, let’s move on to the often-ignored FACT that a planet moving through the solar system has NO effect on you at your birth or at any time during your life. Its gravity isn’t strong enough to do anything to you (and I have to wonder just how a planet’s gravitational pull would affect your ability to make love or money or win the lottery, but I digress).  A distant planet has NO mysterious powers to predict who you will marry, what your life’s work will be, how much money you’ll win in a game of chance, or any of the other stuff that astrologers claim it can do.  Ask an astrologer how they actually physically measure the powers of the planets in astrology. Then, laugh at the answer, because it won’t make any sense.

Fact is folks, astrology had a useful lifetime of a few centuries many centuries ago when folks didn’t understand the sky and believed in magical beings and fluffy unicorns and other things that we now know don’t exist now.  Astrologers’ study of the sky helped them create star charts, which are the only remaining link between the old outmoded magical beliefs and today’s modern scientific study of the universe called astronomy.

Astrology is a fantasy.  And fantasies have their place. But, in a useful, modern life, the fantasy of astrology should be just no more than a make-believe game. If you use it to predict your love life, your next raise, the stock market, or anything else, you’re living in a fantasy world of your own choosing, not reality.

If you want to know more about why astrology is not a serious science, please read the excellent article at the Astronomical Society of the Pacific’s website called Horoscopes Versus Telesscopes: A Focus on Astrology.

The Astronomy Fire Hose: Distant Galaxy Edition

Peering Into the Gravitational House of Mirrors

What is it about galaxies that SO evoke our sense of space and distance?  Is it because they’re so big and magnificent? That they stretch across immense regions of space? The idea that these cosmic cities are thronged with stars? If you look at an image of a galaxy like the Milky Way, you see stars and regions where stars are born and die, and you see (if it has one) the central core with a black hole at its heart.

But, how did galaxies get started?  How were they born?  And what is their lifestyle like?  These are questions that astronomers are still working to answer. Understanding the origin and evolution of galaxies benefits from looking at galaxies in all stages of their lives.  And, so, astronomers look through billions of years of cosmic history to study some of the earliest galaxies.

This illustrates how gravitational lensing by foreground galaxies will influence the appearance of far more distant background galaxies. This means that as many as 20 percent of the most distant galaxies currently detected will appear brighter because their light is being amplified by the effects of foreground intense gravitational fields. The plane at far left contains background high-redshift galaxies. The middle plane contains foreground galaxies; their gravity amplifies the brightness of the background galaxies. The right plane shows how the field would look from Earth with the effects of gravitational lensing added. Distant galaxies that might otherwise be invisible appear due to lensing effects.

There’s a little bit of a problem looking back that far. We have to peer through what amounts to a cosmic “house of mirrors” to see the youngest galactic objects in the universe. Everything we see in this house of mirrors is distorted by a phenomenon called gravitational lensing. This occurs when light from a distant object is distorted by a massive object that is in the foreground.

Astronomers have started to apply this concept in a new way to determine the number of very distant galaxies and to measure the amount of something called “dark matter” in the universe.

So, how does gravitational lensing work?

Albert Einstein showed that gravity will cause light to bend. The effect is normally extremely small, but when light passes close to a very massive object such as a massive galaxy, a galaxy cluster, or a supermassive black hole, the bending of the light rays becomes more easily noticeable.

When light from a very distant object passes a galaxy much closer to us, it can detour around the foreground object. Typically, the light bends around the object in one of two, or four different routes. This magnifies the light from the more distant galaxy directly behind it. What you get is a sort of “natural telescope”, called a gravitational lens. It provides a larger and brighter — though also distorted — view of the distant galaxy.

A very massive object — or collection of objects — distorts the view of faint objects beyond it so much that the distant images are smeared into multiple arc-shaped images around the foreground object. This effect is a lot like looking through a glass soft drink bottle at a light on a balcony and noticing how it is distorted as it passes through the bottle.

This is a very cool idea and I remember back in graduate school first learning about lensing, and we all thought it was almost too weird. At that time, all we could really see were the brightest, most obvious lensed objects.  Now, we can see many of these distortions. And, as we move toward fainter and more distant objects, many of the more recently observed ones pushing the limits of the Hubble Space Telescope.  Even fainter ones will need something with more observing power.  If all goes well, those next generation objects to be observed will be more effectively handled by a new space telescope on the drawing boards — the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).

First Light and Lensing

When you look back to when the universe was young, you are seeing extremely early objects (also known as “first light” objects) that are very far away. The older and farther away the object, the more foreground universe there is to look through, which means the greater the chance that there will be something heavy in the foreground to distort the background image.  Dr. Rogier Windhorst of Arizona State University, is doing research suggests that gravitational lensing is likely to dominate the observed properties of very early galaxies, those that are at most 650-480 million years old The halos of foreground galaxies when the universe was in its heydays of star formation (when it was about 3-6 billion years old) will gravitationally distort most of these very early objects.  This leads to an effect called “gravitational lensing bias” where we are seeing many things whose light is stretched by lensing.  He reported on that work today at the AAS meeting, by way of pointing out just how useful future telescopes, especially the JWST, will be in extending our view out to the early universe and dealing with this house of mirrors effect.

JWST will have to take this bias into account. Scientists like Windhorst and his colleagues will need to design new ways of handling the data from those observations to really help them understand just what it is those early, distant gravitationally lensed galaxies are doing… and how they evolve to become the galaxies we see today.