Double Your Viewing

Test Your Eyes with Alcor and Mizar

The Big Dipper as seen from Kalalau Valley, Hawai'i. Courtesy User: gh5046; used under a Creative Commons ShareAlike License. on Wikipedia.

The Big Dipper is one of those constellations we all learn (in the Northern Hemisphere) pretty early on. It’s easy to spot, it’s a shape that most of us recognize — even if some of us in Europe and other regions call it a Plough. It’s a pattern that we use to teach people how to find other things in the sky, such as the star Arcturus or the North Star (Polaris).

Of course, the Big Dipper is part of a larger constellation called “Ursa Major” which is Latin for “Greater Bear”.  The Dipper forms the back and tail of the Bear, and there are tales across many of the world’s cultures about this Bear and its exploits.  Most of us don’t look for all the stars of the bear, preferring to concentrate on the Dipper itself.

If you look at the Big Dipper’s handle, there’s a double star you can spot with your  naked eye (provided you have a good dark viewing area).  If you live in a city, you can probably spot the double with binoculars or a small telescope.

Those two stars are called Alcor and Mizar and for many years, people would use the ability to spot these two without magnification as a test of their eyesight.  They lie about a light-year apart and they are moving together through space as part of a larger group of stars called the Ursa Major Moving Group.

As it turns out, when you look at Alcor and Mizar, you’re looking at a six-star system. Alcor itself is actually two stars called Alcor A and B, and Mizar is really a system of two binary stars (making four total stars for Mizar).   It’s worth checking out and the weather this time of year is great for kicking back and seeing if YOU can make out Alcor and Mizar with your naked eye. (You won’t find the other stars without some major magnification, but that’s okay.  The objective here is to see what you can find just by taking a gander at the bend in the Dipper’s handle. Check it out!

 

Super Moon? Super What?

Lunar Feeding Frenzy

So, this weekend we’re supposed to be seeing something called the “SuperMoon”.  I don’t know what that means, really.  It’s another superlative name like “OctoMom” or “MegaMillions” that really doesn’t tell you much.  Oh, sure, MegaMillions is a come-0n to buy lottery tickets, but honestly, the last time I bought one, the prize wasn’t so “Mega”.  It was more like a few million.  Now “mega” would be a prize to win.  If you don’t believe me, go look it up. And don’t get me started on all the wrongness of the name “OctoMom”.  You can look that one up on your own time.

Getting back to “SuperMoon”.  The Full Moon occurs on Sunday May 6 at 03:35 UT (that’s Saturday May 5 at 8:35 p.m., PDT, 9:35 p.m. Mountain Time, 10:35 p.m., CDT, 11:35 p.m. EDT, in the U.S.).  It just so happens that it’s occurring at the same time that the Moon is closest to Earth in its orbit.  This is perfectly normal. It happens in the orbital mechanics of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The Moon’s distance varies during its orbit; sometimes it’s closer and sometimes it’s farther away.

The Full Moon will be at perigee, essentially. Or, if you want the technical term: the event is referred to by scientists as perigee-syzygy (of the Earth-Sun-Moon system).   The Moon will be 12 percent brighter and larger than the usual Full Moon.  Will you be able to tell the difference between the Moon at perigee at Full Moon and a Full Moon NOT at perigee?  Probably not.  It’s not going to appear much different to you unless you make a practice of charting the Moon’s size and brightness daily (or nightly). Mind you, it’s still going to be beautiful.  I like what my friend Neil deGrasse Tyson said about it:  “The impending Supermoon is to an average full Moon what a 16″ Pizza is to a 15″ Pizza. So chillax.”

Interestingly enough, the term “supermoon” isn’t really even a scientific one. It appears to be an astrological one, and at least one writer (and probably more) have come up with the idea that these supermoons cause earthquakes and other natural disasters. However, the evidence (taken from actual observations of when earthquakes and other events actually happened) doesn’t support the idea. That hasn’t stopped people who really ought to know better from hyping the “SuperMoon” as some sort of mystical time when Earth is in danger. Orbital mechanics being what they are, supermoons are gonna happen, and earthquakes are gonna happen, but the likelihood of one influencing the other is pretty darned low.

If I were you, I’d just go out and enjoy the beauty of the Full Moon. It doesn’t have to be “Super” for you and yours to step out with a pair of binoculars or a small telescope and just explore the lunar surface. It can be quite relaxing… and breathtaking. No hype needed.