Category Archives: astrobiology

It’s a Chemical Universe

Have you ever heard someone say something dismissive about chemicals? Like comments that indicate these substances are somehow separate from us? It’s pretty common to see some people advocate for “natural” or “organic” products. Or, they preach against vaccinations because they wrongly assume these lifesaving injections are somehow “full of toxins and chemicals”.

It always sounds so silly, to me. I mean, the entire detectable universe consists of chemical elements. That means you and me and the planet and the Sun and Moon and… well, everything we can directly detect. So how can substances or objects consisting of chemicals be somehow unnatural?

Yes, I get that these people are often referring to specific things in vaccinations, for example. (Things that aren’t there, by the way. Or, they’re completely misunderstood or misinterpreted by people with a lack of critical thinking skills. But that’s a different topic.) That old argument about chemicals being somehow “unnatural” and “toxic” just ignores the reality of our existence.

Chemical Ingredients for Life Are as Old as the Universe

Take a look at your hand. Or the apple you’re eating. Or the coffee in your cup. And, the cup itself. Every object you can sense is made of chemicals. Or, to be more specific, chemical elements combined into molecules. Those are, themselves part of some kind of cellular matrix. I always liked the bit in the first “Cosmos” series where Dr. Carl Sagan suggested that, “If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.”

It’s true. The apple is a construct of atoms of elements that formed complex molecules. They combine to make the apple’s structure. So is the crust. So is the sugar (if you use that), and so are the other ingredients. And, so are all the things inside vaccines. In some cases,they have killed viruses that we wish to inoculate against. And, the viruses themselves are incredibly complex mixtures of molecules made of chemical elements.

Space is where we come from, it’s where the chemicals of life originate and spread seed to places where life can thrive. NASA/Jenna Mottar.

So, where do those “fixin’s” come from? Why from the stars, of course. Other than hydrogen and a little lithium, most other chemical elements come from stars. So, calcium (for your bones), iron (for your blood), potassium (to regulate heart activity), and other elements, come from stars. They cook them up as they age and evolve, and when they die, stars scatter that “stuff” to the universe. There, it gets taken up (eventually), into clouds of gas and dust, which are the birthplaces of stars and planets. And, planets (as we suspect from our sample of one) are formation places for life.

Chemical Clouds Hold Clues to Life

We know that interstellar clouds contain hydrogen. That element was created in the Big Bang. The clouds also harbor complex organic molecules. Many of those substances are actually the building blocks of life. And, they seem to be in many such cloud complexes.

Astronomers, astrobiologists (the folks who study life elsewhere), and astrochemists (who study chemical elements in the universe) want to know how soon in the universe these molecules appeared. What causes their formation? In a disk of gas and dust, when do the building blocks of life appear? One suggestion is that they form in response to rising heat and pressures in a protoplanetary disk. That’s the part of the cloud where a star and its planets are born.

When Do Chemical Percursors Form?

At least one study shows that those complex organic molecules can exist long before a protostar begins to form. In that research, scientists found molecules of methanol and acetaldehyde in a large number of starforming regions called “pre-stellar” or “starless”. These places don’t have stars, yet. However, they seem to be places where cold dust and gases coalesce. There, they form the seeds that eventually will give rise to stars (and planets). And, according to the scientists who are studying these regions, they contain life’s building blocks, before worlds exist to take advantage of them.

These two molecules aren’t the only prebiotic precursors found in such clouds. A simple sugar molecule called glycolaldehyde has been detected, along with a host of other carbon-based molecules. These discoveries show us that we are in a chemical universe that provides the seeds of life.

Finding Chemical Precursors

To study the clouds for their particular discovery, a team of scientists at the University of Arizona’s Steward Observatory, used a 12-meter dish telescope to study emissions from interstellar clouds. They peered at 31 starless cores scattered throughout a star-forming region known as the Taurus molecular cloud. That cloud lies about 440 light-years from Earth. Each core is quite large, about the width of a thousand solar systems. None of the cores has a star at its heart, and probably won’t for several hundred thousand years.

That’s according to Yancy Shirley, who worked with graduate student Samantha Scibelli on the project. “This tells us that the basic organic chemistry needed for life is present in the raw gas prior to the formation of stars and planets,” he said. The processes that bring chemical elements together to form organic molecular building blocks of life aren’t well understood. “The exact processes at play are still being debated because the theoretical models still don’t quite match what we see,” Scibelli said. With the current research, she and the team can constrain the formation sequence that might be taking place in the clouds.

Their work will tell theorists how abundant these molecules are. Eventually, it may be possible to figure out exactly how these molecules form and why they exist where they do. That would open up a wider range of places to study the chemicals that create life. (You can read more about this specific research here.

Accepting a Chemical Universe

It’s thanks to the prebiotic molecules that formed in our local neighborhood that we even exist today. Studies like the one at Arizona are the first steps toward trying to figure out where life exists elsewhere. Even more intriguing: it plays a big role in revealing where life could form next. And, we have chemical elements to thank for it. We’re all made of star-stuff, which is, in turn, made of chemicals. So, now I wonder, what could be more natural than chemicals? After all, they’re what we are.

It’s Hard out there for an Alien

No Calls From ETs?  They Might Be Extinct

parkes telescope looks for alien life signals
CSIRO Parkes radio telescope searches for alien signals. Courtesy CSIRO/Wayne England.

I know it’s a tough call for the alien fans out there (and I have to confess, I DO think that there’s life out there somewhere), but a group of astrobiologists led by Dr. Aditya Chopra and Professor Charley Lineweaver (at Australian National University) has predicted that life on distant worlds isn’t being found because it’s likely to be extinct already. If what they’re saying is true, then the galaxy could be a pretty sparsely populated place indeed.

Extinction seems like a tough fate, but think about where life typically is expected to arise: newborn planets. Such places are not tranquil neighborhoods where happy little baby microbes flourish and evolve to become multi-celled life, and eventually grow up to build Starbucks franchises everywhere.

No, these infant worlds are harsh places. Really harsh. They get blasted by their stars (which themselves are young and feisty). Their atmospheres are toxic to most (if not all) forms of life.  They might lose their magnetic fields, and then their atmospheres. Or, they might suffer incredible impacts that melt the surface over and over again. Whatever happens, when conditions do settle down and allow the formation of simple microbes, things can change through rapid global cooling and heating. These episodes can easily wipe out any simple one-celled life forms before they have a chance to take the first step up the evolutionary ladder. These early life forms can be quite fragile, and may not evolve quickly enough to ride out the swift changes on their home worlds.

Worlds and  Alien Life

The science of astrobiology looks at the conditions needed to make a world welcome (or at least less-hostile) to life. A habitable world needs warmth, water, and some sort of food for the life to eat (and that can take many forms). It also has to have some way to regulate the greenhouse gases in its atmosphere to keep the surface relatively temperate so life can take hold and spread. That’s tough to do when the early atmospheres are so unstable. Yet, Earth managed to do it — albeit with a few mass extinctions along the way. Life still took hold and thrives today.

Smacking Down Life in our Solar System

The “perfect” places for life to arise do exist in the galaxy. Wet, rocky planets are out there. Many have the “stuff” needed to created and sustain life. It certainly worked on Earth, but our planet may have gotten lucky. And, the fact that we just haven’t gotten any signals from life forms whose microbial and multi-celled ancestors survived the turbulent early years of their planets, has raised questions for years.

Look at the other planets that formed in our neighborhood: Venus and Mars. They had the same ‘starting assets’ as Earth, but Venus took a wrong turn and now it’s a hellish volcanic planet smothered in heavy CO2 clouds and sulfuric acid rains. Mars went the other way, lost its magnetic field, then its atmosphere, and froze. No life has been found on either world, although it’s possible we might find remains of ancient microbial life on Mars. If it did exist there, it didn’t adapt fast enough or work to stabilize its environment. Life did help stabilize Earth’s early climate, and that helped make it much more habitable for the life forms that did evolve.

Cutting the Signal from Alien Life Before it Starts

If it’s true that infant planets don’t provide a good place for life, or that the life that does manage to rise up can’t survive the unstable climate changes on those baby worlds, then this might explain why we haven’t gotten any hint of intelligent life “out there”. It may not have actually have had time to arise, or its predecessors were snuffed out. Researchers have called this problem the “Gaian Bottleneck”, which is a colorful term for early extinction on nearly all young planets.

If this bottleneck really is occurring, then when and if we DO get to other worlds (Mars and beyond), we may well find a lot of fossils of extinct microbes. That’s because life forms such as humans, dogs, cats, cows, horses, whales, flowering plants, trees, insects, and so on, take millions of years to evolve. If their predecessors rise up on a planet with an inhospitable, rapidly changing environment, there just isn’t going to be enough time for intelligent life to evolve.

It’s an interesting idea, this Gaian Bottleneck. The longer we go without a signal or trace of life elsewhere in the universe, the more scientists may have to admit that time is not on the side of intelligent life that can send signals out to announce its presence. And, as someone who things that there probably IS out there, this theory may explain that — even if there ARE aliens out there — they may be much rarer than we hoped.