Category Archives: dwarf planets

Building Sedna

sedna
An artist’s conception of Sedna, a dwarf planet in the Kuiper Belt. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Remember a year or so back when the largest Kuiper Belt Object to date, named Sedna, was discovered? It shifted planetary scientists’ attention to the origin and evolution (and existence!) of large, planetoid-sized objects out beyond Pluto. They’ve been working out the fine details of Sedna’s orbit for a while now, using sophisticated models of the early solar system formation. One of the outcomes of this work is the idea that this nearly-Pluto-sized “worldlet” actually formed in place in the frigid deep-freeze of the outermost solar system. Originally scientists thought it was assembled farther in toward the Sun during the early days of the system’s formation, and was somehow ejected out to its current position.
Why does where Sedna formed matter? Astronomers have longed assumed that planetary formation took place in a rather smaller region of the original solar nebula. If Sedna was created from the collisions of smaller bodies out in the “sticks” of the solar system, then the planetary factory is bigger than everybody suspected. It also means that the Kuiper Belt, which hosts countless bodies at what used to be called “the edge of the solar system” is really part of a larger region called the Kuiper disk and played a much more prominent role in the formation of planets and moons.
The modeling that led to these conclusions was done at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado. In the press release they sent out announcing this work, the institute’s Executive Director for Space Studies, Alan Stern (a former colleague of mine from the University of Colorado), talked about some of the assumptions they made in constructing their model: “”The Sedna formation simulations assumed that the primordial solar nebula was a disk about the size of those observed around many nearby middle-aged stars — like the well-known example of the 1,500-AU-wide disk around the star Beta Pictoris.”
It’s interesting work because it gives us a whole lot MORE insight into the infancy of our own solar system, in particular the formation of planets from smaller planetesimals. And, chances are if Sedna formed where the astronomers think it did, then there could well be more large planetoids circling around out there with it — and that what we used to think of as the “emptiness of the outer solar system” isn’t so empty anymore. As astronomers learn more about the Sun’s outermost retinue of planetesimals, they are finding more clues to what conditions were like early in the history of solar system.

Sedna: The Latest of the Outermost Objects in the Solar System

Sedna
Sedna

You gotta love the Hubble Space Telescope. There it is up there, looking out across the deeps of space and time, spotting shreds of galaxies as they formed some 300,000 to 500,000 years after the Big Bang, and then it turns around and gives us a view of a little shard of a world called Sedna. This place, smaller than the Moon, smaller than Pluto, lies about 90 times the distance between the Earth and Sun, out in a region of the solar system called the Kuiper Belt. It’s a leftover bit of ice (mostly) from the formation of the solar system some 5.5 billion years ago. It’s so dim and small that HST’s image is one pixel across. But, it’s an informative pixel!

For instance, it tells us that (so far) HST hasn’t spotted a companion to this planetoid, although the astronomer who discovered it on March 15, 2004, calculated its spin rate (it’s “day”) and determined that it should have a moon of some kind. The fact that it doesn’t illustrates one of those wonderful “non-results” that tells us valuable information. Science is replete with stuff like this — what looks like a non-result actually helps us put limits on an object’s actions or size or mass or other characteristic. It reminds me of the observation run I did in Hawaii where we studied Comet Hale-Bopp in late 1996. We thought we might be able to spot a plasma tail forming earlier than might be expected. However, when we examined the data, we found no evidence of the plasma tail, which told us that even with a comet of that size, it had to be close enough to the Sun (essentially within about 2 to 2.5 AU of the Sun) before its plasma tail would form. It helped us nail down parts of a descriptive theory we were formulating about how and when and why these glowing tails form when they do as a comet approaches the Sun during its orbit.

Astronomers will keep studying Sedna, and in fact, they have looked at it with other telescopes since its discovery. Expect to see a few more announcements about this frigid world at the frontiers of the solar system!