Category Archives: science media

If It Bleeds, It Leads

Otherwise, Not so Much

Over the past couple of days, millions of people around the world have peaceably come together in person and on the internet to celebrate astronomy. They have been going to star parties in their home towns, viewing objects online through linked telescopes, touring of the world’s observatories, and doing many other activities that people have come out for and enjoyed.

Did you read about this in the press? See anything about it on CNN.com or MSNBC or al-Jazeera, or the Beeb or any of the other “big” online news presences?  I’m guessing not, although there have been stories in local newspapers and, of course, in the blogosphere.  If you relied only on the “mainstream” media, you’d never know that this is the International Year of Astronomy, or that astronomy is one of those sciences that hooks into people’s sense of awe and wonder about the universe. It’s a GOOD thing, but it doesn’t bleed. So, it doesn’t lead. Or if it does lead, it’s because some editor somewhere thought it was time for a “weird” story.

It appears that the “mainstream” media has pretty much abdicated any kind of serious science reporting these days, leaving it for — well, I dunno, people like me, to cover science or science-related stories. What passes for “science’ media these days is a kind of techy-business-driven commentary about the latest apps for iPhones or some new medical finding.  Occasionally you see stories about Antarctica melting or a new picture from HST, but that’s pretty much it. There’s very little concerted reporting (on a daily basis) about science for its own sake. And, heaven forfend anybody write about the interest that millions of people have in astronomy on a weekend when an official, world-wide event ABOUT astronomy is taking place. “What?” I can hear a bunch of editors asking, “Spend news time on a bunch of geeks?  Are they nekkid?  Protesting?  what’s that you say? They’re looking through telescopes and having a great time and sharing what they see with other people around the world?  No news there.. .who cares?”

This means that YOU as a taxpayer, an interested person, an armchair scientist of some kind, lose out on a very fascinating part of what other people are doing to understand our world.

So, what exactly is the news media focusing on?  Not science. Not even close.

Let’s take a look at a typical example — CNN.com.  I went over and perused their front page today.  Aside from the necessary headlines of the day (the New York state murders, the North Korean rocket launch), some stories there have been there for several days running. Do we really need three days of incessant analysis of Michelle Obama’s J. Crew sweater?  Do we need to see the same losing politicians and think-tankers bloviating about banking policy?  How many times can we read the story about the teenager who made a duct-tape prom dress?

I clicked on the Science/Tech link and got a story about biodegradable chewing gum that’s been up for a few days; another one about the return of the right whale (yay), more stories about Mt. Redoubt, and NOTHING about millions of people celebrating 100 Hours of Astronomy.  If millions of people had, say, decided to not pay their taxes or march on a country’s capital (or better yet, from a newsmedia standpoint, get in a riot and spill some blood), then THAT would be news.

But somehow, the idea that that many people could get together and enjoy science just doesn’t resonate with the media.  So, I kind of wonder — and mind you, I’m a trained journalist and have a science research background — just exactly what good is the “mainstream” media if it’s not covering stuff that millions of people do?  If it’s not even giving a perfunctory note about something as wonderful as a world full of people celebrating astronomy?  Science is part of our lives, but you wouldn’t know it from the lack of coverage of something as cool as ordinary people joining with each other to look at the sky and learn.

Get Yer Science News!

Respectable Places to Get Comprehensive Science News

In the wake of CNN dumping its formerly comprehensive science coverage and lumping it all in under some “perilous planet” heading, and in light of other media outlets deciding that experienced science writers and dedicated science sections are things that stand in the way of bigger executive bonuses (and the public’s need to know be damned), I’ve decided to whip up a list of science news sites you can go online to get science fix. This entry is mainly about official news organizations (not agencies with PIO arms) that report science news in the English language. I’ll do another one about blogs sometime soon, and if anybody wants to email me good sources in other languages, I’ll do an entry on those sometime, too.

The first is, appropriately enough, Science News. They have a free page and a highly worthwhile pay site, so support them.

Next up is Discover Magazine Online. They have a number of interesting approaches, they support bloggers like Phil Plait and others, and they seem to be pretty honest in their reporting.

The venerable BBC has a good science and technology section; well worth bookmarking on your browser toolbar (as I have on mine).

A source that I rely on quite a bit is EurekAlert! It’s mainly for journalists, but they do make press releases public after embargos expire. Browse through it sometime.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science has a magazine called Science Now. It has a free online component, and a full subscription available for a fee.  Worth supporting!

Phys.org — the magazine of physics, science, tech, nano, and news, is another good place to get your science fix.

ScienceDaily gives you the latest research news, straight and hot from the journals!

NewScientist is another good source of science reporting.

National Geographic’s site has a news page worth checking out.

Got any other news organizations that do a good job of reporting science news?  Let me know.