“Squirting-Gun” Evidence of Flowing Water on Mars

Woohoo!! Something’s flowing down a gully in an impact crater and Mars and it might be water! NASA and Malin Space Science Systems today announced that their scientists may have found evidence of flowing liquid water, possibly in the form of an icy, slushy, muddy flow that spread about 5-10 swimming pools worth of water across the surface at the mid-latitudes of Mars!

Read more at Malin Space Science Systems.
Read more at Malin Space Science Systems

The scientists are not yet sure what the mechanism is behind the flowing material, but one possible scenario has flowing liquid squirting out from broken layers of rock in impact craters. As it does, it forms gullies and deposits sand, silt, and minerals in the flow path. The water itself forms fog, mist, and water droplets that freeze into crystals.

How do we know this is a liquid flow and not a landslide? Scientist Ken Edgett pointed out the differences between how a landslide looks on Mars and how a feature created by flowing water looks. The liquid that flowed across the surface most likely had sediments in it, sort of like a mudflow. The way it moved down the 20- to 30-degree slope in the crater in the image indicates that it had to be water. The brightness of the flow feature is very unusual. In landslides and impact craters, material that is turned up from below the surface is usually dark.

If this feature was a landslide, it would be darker. The material we see is lighter, which indicates that it could be water that flows out from underground, hits the cold air and low-pressure atmosphere and turns into a frothy stream. Or, it could also be water with salts and other minerals entrained in it. Either way, it’s quite likely that the flow has water in it.

If this is a water flow, how is the liquid getting out? What’s causing the flow? The scientists are still debating the sources: subsurface aquifers, melting snow, or ground ice (which does require something to melt it). It’s still unclear why the water is flowing; now we need to figure out why.

The interesting thing is that these water flows are coming out of the walls of impact craters. The force of a collision weakens rock, and any aquifers would then find a ready outlet for flowing water through the broken, cracked rock.

Courtesy Malin Space Science Systems
Courtesy Malin Space Science Systems

There’s still a lot to learn, but the cool story is that we now have proof of flowing water on Mars.

The other find announced today was the discovery of at least 20 very recent impact craters on Mars. The collisions occurred sometime between May 1999 and March 2006. This is an interesting juxaposition of finds; both may help scientists understand the story of water on Mars and the very real, daily events that continually change the Martian surface. Stay tuned!

Update on the NSTA Story

It would appear that the controversy over the NSTA story rejecting the distribution of DVDs of “An Inconvenient Truth” has been heating up lately. NSTA, not surprisingly, in a Nov. 28, 2006 press release has defended their actions as part of their policy of not distributing unasked-for goods to teachers via mail. The producer of the documentary, Laurie David, did not mention that policy in her critical Washington Post editorial of a week or so back. NSTA still cannot explain why it rejected the DVDs by saying first that they didn’t want to take risks with their current sponsors (including ExxonMobil). If they had a policy, they should have made THAT their excuse, not raising the fear of angering sponsors.

There seems to be a lot of finger-pointing going on, and nobody seems to be wearing the white hats in this saga.

Someone sent me a link to a Science Magazine article about the to-do over this. Also, our old friend Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer is digging into the issue as well.

Still, things are not as cut-and-dried as they seemed when I posted about this last week. In reading over the NSTA’s press release, I wonder what the difference is between the activities they tout which were paid for by sponsor money and the action of sending out (or making available) a DVD. It’s a sponsorship, just in a different form. In both cases, a message is being sent (taught), paid for by somebody with a reason to want that message out there. It’s all information, and in a subject as sensitive and important as global warming and environmental science, more information is good.

Stay tuned.

Exploring Science and the Cosmos

Spam prevention powered by Akismet