These pages chronicle the work and ruminations of Carolyn Collins Petersen, also known as TheSpacewriter.
I am CEO of Loch Ness Productions. I am also a producer for Astrocast.TV, an online magazine about astronomy and space science.
For the past few years, I've also been a voice actor, appearing in a variety of productions. You can see and hear samples of my work by clicking on the "Voice-Overs, Videos and 'Casts tab.
My blog, TheSpacewriter's Ramblings, is about astronomy, space science, and other sciences.
Ideas and opinions expressed here do not represent those of my employer or of any other organization to which I am affiliated. They're mine.
Visit my main site at: TheSpacewriter.com.
**I encourage comments and discussion; please keep it polite and respectful. I do moderate them to weed out spam, but I also refuse to post any messages that contain harassing, demeaning, rude, or profane language. I run a respectable establishment here.
Contact me for writing and voice-over projects at: cc(dot)petersen(at)gmail(dot)com
I Twitter as Spacewriter
Blog entry posting times are U.S. Mountain Time (GMT-6:00) All postings Copyright 2003-2011 C.C. Petersen
Spacewriter’s Recent Posts
- Writing about Astronomy
- The End of the Kepler Mission?
- Using the Sky
- A Little Solar Activity
- All Hail Albertus Alauda
- Hubble Spots Comet ISON
- The Once and Future Universe
- ► 2013 (34)
- ► 2012 (78)
- ► 2011 (107)
- ► 2010 (95)
- ► 2009 (225)
- ► 2008 (291)
- ► 2007 (114)
- ► 2006 (72)
- ► 2005 (56)
- ► 2004 (96)
- ► 2003 (74)
- ► 2002 (21)
|« Sep||Nov »|
Like space music?
Check out my favorite
space music artist:
- 21st Century Waves - Technology Booms and Human Expansion Into the Cosmos
- About.Com Space/Astronomy
- Adot’s NotBlog
- Astronomy Blog
- Astronomy Cast
- BLooloop: CCP
- Captain Disillusion
- ChandraBlog - Chandra X-ray Telescope
- Cosmic Log
- Cosmic Mirror
- Cosmic Variance
- Discovery Space
- DP’s Astronomy Blog
- European Southern Observatory
- Friends of the Griffith Observatory
- Gemini Observatory
- Griffith Observatory
- Hairy Museum of Natural History
- Hubble Space Telescope
- Kids Directory
- Loch Ness Productions - Cosmic content
- Loch Ness Productions on Facebook - the world’s foremost fulldome video producer for planetarium shows
- Mike Brown’s Planets
- MIT/Haystack Observatory
- MWA Vodcast
- NASA Climate Change
- National Public Radio
- Observing the Sky
- One Astronomer’s Noise
- Prince of Pithy
- Science Made Cool
- Significant Snail
- Solar System Watch
- Space Times News
- Space Weather FX Vodcasts
- Star Stryder
- Stop Unethical Recission
- String Theory
- The Daily Galaxy
- The Mathroom (possibly NSFW)
- The Meridiani Journal
- The Planetary Society Blog
- The Way Things Break
- Understanding Science
- Universe Today
October 24, 2003 at 16:31 pm | Leave a Comment
I got a press release from my friends over at Sky Publishing Corporation, publishers of Sky & Telescope Magazine. Now’s the time to plan ahead for viewing the next total lunar eclipse of 2003. Read on for details!
“On Saturday night, November 8-9, 2003, the full Moon will pass through the Earth’s shadow for skywatchers throughout the Americas, Europe, and Africa, and in parts of Asia. For the Americas, this will be the second lunar eclipse of 2003; the first took place the night of May 15-16.
But the total phase of November’s eclipse will be unusually brief, lasting only 25 minutes as the Moon skims barely inside the southern edge of our planet’s dark shadow.
Skywatchers in eastern North America will see the entire eclipse during dark evening hours. Those living in the western half of North America will find the eclipse already in progress as the Moon rises around sunset.
All of Europe and most of Africa will see the eclipse in its entirety much later Saturday night. Observers in eastern and southern Africa, the Middle East, and southern Asia will see the eclipsed Moon set around sunrise on Sunday morning.
[For a nifty table of times and visibility, click here.]
A total lunar eclipse occurs when the Sun, Earth, and Moon form a nearly straight line in space, so that the full Moon passes through Earth’s shadow. Unlike a solar eclipse, which requires special equipment to observe safely, you can watch a lunar eclipse with your unaided eyes. Binoculars or a small telescope will enhance the view dramatically.
As the Moon moves into the outer fringe, or penumbra, of Earth’s shadow, it will fade very slightly — imperceptibly at first. Only when the leading edge of the Moon is at least halfway into the penumbra is any shading visible at all.
The real show starts when the Moon’s leading edge first enters the shadow’s dark core, or umbra, and the partial eclipse begins. For the next hour and 34 minutes, more and more of the Moon will slide into dark shadow.
The total eclipse begins when the Moon is fully within the umbra. But it likely won’t be blacked out. The totally eclipsed Moon should linger as an eerie dark gray or coppery red disk in the sky, as sunlight scattered around the edge of our atmosphere paints the lunar surface with a warm glow. This is light from all the sunrises and sunsets that are in progress around Earth at the time.
Each total lunar eclipse is different. Sometimes the Moon looks like an orange glowing coal, while at other times it virtually disappears from view. Its brightness depends on the amount of dust in the Earth’s upper atmosphere at the time, which influences the amount of sunlight that filters around the Earth’s edges.
Because the Moon passes just inside the umbra, totality will be very short and the Moon’s southern edge, in particular, should remain fairly bright. After only 25 minutes the leading edge of the Moon will emerge back into sunlight, and the eclipse is again partial. In another hour and 33 minutes the last of the Moon emerges out of the umbra.
Details about this event, and the solar eclipse visible from Antarctica, Australia, and New Zealand on November 23-24, appear in the November 2003 issue of SKY & TELESCOPE magazine.
The next total eclipse of the Moon falls on May 4-5, 2004, and is visible from central and south Asia, the Middle East, and the eastern two-thirds of Africa. North Americans will see their next lunar eclipse on October 27-28, 2004.”
October 21, 2003 at 17:03 pm | Leave a Comment
In 1990 I wrote a planetarium show about a space cat. His name was Larry (after our own Lawrence E. Katt, who was with us from his birth in 1982 until his passing in 1999) and he had all kinds of adventures. Now we have three other cats (Pixel, Miranda, and Lazarus Long), and they’re all sort of astro cats in one way or another. Pixel is named after a Robert Heinlein cat character who plied the spaceways with Maureen Johnson Long. Miranda is so named because her mottled coloring reminded us of the Uranian moon Miranda.
And Laz (our newest addition) is named after another Robert Heinlein character who also plied the spaceways through a number of novels. What is it about cats and space? Would they do well on long voyages, in weightlessness? Would they travel well? I’ve always wondered about taking a cat on a cruise ship. Seems like a good companion to have on those days when all you want to do is slip into your cabin and relax…
Of course there are cats in astronomy. The constellations Leo Major and Leo Minor come to mind.
Aside from the constellations, cats show up in the cosmological tales of such civilizations as the Aztec, where their Jaguar God Tezcatlipoca rules the stars as god of the night sky and the winds of night. His name really means “smoking mirror”, which gives him a sort of magical aspect.
And of course, there is Bastet, the cat deity who was both goddess and protectress of cats and the people who lived with and cared for cats. While not exactly a deity associated with the stars, she was important in her own right — and I like to think of ancient Egyptians out stargazing with their cats by their sides!
So, how do cats figure in today’s stargazing? Hard to tell. Probably they don’t care much about what their humans are doing outside, as long as food regularly appears and the humans let them out to help during backyard stargazing sessions. I have a friend who used to brag that he kept a kitten in each pocket to keep his hands warm during long periods at the telescope. Our own cats don’t go outside (we live near a wooded area that is home to many critters that see cats as a tasty main dish), but they do like spend time indoors crawling around on the telescope base for my Dob and sleeping on the case for my 6″ Sovietski scope. But perhaps our cats are the exception. Maybe your cats go out stargazing with you ” and spend their evenings watching YOU scan through Leo or Lynx looking for excitement, adventure, and deep-sky objects! They’re great observers too — while you’re watching the universe, they’re watching YOU.
October 20, 2003 at 23:29 pm | Leave a Comment
People of a “certain age” might remember all the old jokes about “x-ray eyes” in science fiction stories. Truth is, if we had X-ray eyes, we’d look vastly different than we do as human beings. And we would have had to evolve in the light of a star that gave off massive amounts of X rays and on a planet that didn’t shield us from that radiation. Like I said, if we did, we’d look very different.
Just because we can’t see X rays with our naked eyes doesn’t mean that things in the universe don’t give them off. To be sure, our Sun does give them off — but not as strongly as some objects do. There is some evidence — found by studying starbirth nurseries like the Orion Nebula — that the Sun’s infancy might have been quite a stormy one, marked by blustery stellar winds, outflowing jets, and a much higher amount of X-ray emissions than it shows now. The cause of those emissions and how long they lasted are topics that currently fascinate astronomers who study the early lives of stars.
To chart x-rays coming from stellar newborns, astronomers pointed the Chandra X-Ray Observatory at the Orion Nebula and found bright X-ray sources among the stellar babies just coming to life in that cloud of gas and dust. The x-ray image above shows about a thousand young stars in a 10 light-year-wide region of the Orion Nebula star cluster. These newborns are just blazing away with x-rays produced in the upper atmospheres of these stars. These are regions where the temperatures are millions of degrees hot. The bright stars in the center are part of the Trapezium — an association of stars less than a million years old. Young stars, such as those found in Orion, are known to be much brighter in x-rays than middle-aged stars such as the Sun.
Why are these stars so bright in x-ray emissions? Astronomers think that all the x-ray activity stems from violent flares in strong magnetic fields near the surfaces of these young stars. Although astronomers have known about the high magnetic activity of young stars for a while, the actual physical causes and evolution of the activities are still being figured out. A region rich in hot, young stars — like the Orion Nebula — provides a perfect laboratory to study the active phases of a newborn star’s life.
We’ve come a long way since people could only look up into the sky with naked eyes and wonder about what they saw. Now we explore the sky with multi-wavelength eyes, seeing things that are stranger and more wonderful than the old “x-ray eyes” sci-fi dramatists could ever imagine. Whenever I look at Orion now, I imagine it in infrared, optical, and x-ray wavelengths of light — and marvel at the things astronomy has to teach us.
Older entries »
This blog a wholly pwnd subsidiary of Carolyn Collins Petersen, a.k.a. TheSpacewriter.
Copyright 2013, Carolyn Collins Petersen
Image of Horsehead Nebula: T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF) and Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA/NASA)
“It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion. It is by the juice of bean that coffee acquires depth, the tongue acquires taste, the taste awakens the body. It is by Coffee alone I set my day in motion.”
Spam prevention powered by Akismet