Category Archives: astronomy

Writing about Astronomy

My Life with the Firehose of Cosmic Information

I have a new book coming out!  It’s called Astronomy 101: From the Sun and Moon to Wormholes and Warp Drive, Key Theories, Discoveries, and Facts about the Universe, due out in a few weeks from Adams Media. I’ve been working with them behind the scenes on distribution and publicity, and so fairly soon they’ll turn on the switch and Astronomy 101 will step out into the spotlight. Stay tuned and I’ll let you know when it’s available. Or, you can go to the Astronomy 101 page on Amazon and put in a pre-order. Currently it says July 18th, but I think it may come out sooner.

I’ve been writing about astronomy for a long time. It began when I was in college as an undergraduate, and just grew from there. Of course, I’ve always been interested in the stars and space travel. That’s a natural outgrowth of growing up when we were still sending people to space and expecting to go to Mars any time in the near future. I’ve written before about how my parents got me interested in the stars. My dad, in particular, would take me outside at night and show me the sky, and occasionally would wake us up to see comets and meteor showers. So, I guess you could say that astronomy is in my DNA. Which is true of all of us, in a very real sense. We ARE star stuff because all the atoms in our bodies came either from the Big Bang (in the case of hydrogen) or from stars (in the case of the iron in our blood, the calcium in our bones, the oxygen we breathe, and so on).

Over the years, I’ve written or co-written a number of books, articles, and scripts about astronomy. My first book was called “Jupiter!” and it featured the space art of Don Davis (an old and dear friend). My next books were about Hubble Space Telescope, and called Hubble Vision, and written with John Brandt. We had a blast bringing the science of HST to the world. We also did a general astronomy book together, too, called Visions of the Cosmos.  A few years later, I teamed up with other editors from Sky & Telescope to work on The New Solar System and Deep-Sky Wonders as an editor.

Outnumbering my books are my videos. You can see every planetarium fulldome show I’ve ever written by simply visiting Loch Ness Productions’ Web site and clicking on the shows link. I’m still writing these shows, and enjoy creating for both fulldome and flatscreen theaters. The most recent one I did was for the International Dark-Sky Association, called Losing the Dark.  It has been translated to seven languages, with ten more on the way.  In recent years, I’ve also taken on doing a Web-based stargazing show called Our Night Sky and an occasional astronomy special called The Astronomer’s Universe for Astrocast.TV, an Web-based video news site focused on astronomy and space science.

So, back to my new book.  As you can see, I’ve been writing for just about any medium I can lay hands on. But, it’s been a while since I’ve done a book. In fact, for awhile after my last book, I thought I probably wouldn’t do another one, given the advent of electronic media and the fact that I’ve been busy writing and producing videos and podcasts.

But, a few months ago, a print publisher got in touch with me and asked if I’d like to do a popular-level book on astronomy which would be available in BOTH print AND eBook formats.  I gave it some thought and decided to give it a whack. Creating for both print and eBooks imposes some distinct requirements on a writer and publisher that we didn’t face back when books were only tree-based. For example, illustrations have to be very clean and easy to reproduce in eBook format.  We still have color images in the book, which is great.

Now, the idea of a very general book on astronomy is nothing new. The publishers wanted to do something a little different: they wanted to have a book you could pick up, flip through, choose a topic, and read a thousand or so words on that topic and get a good bite-sized idea of it.  No math, no equations, just some storytelling and a few interesting facts to pique your interest. And, that’s the book they asked me to do.

This is where the firehose idea comes in. Astronomy is HUGE. There are thousands of topics that you could write about. Literally.  But, I had to pick about 55 or 60, and write about those. So, I did. On a tremendously tight deadline (welcome to the NEW world of publishing, folks!). The result is, I hope, a handy little book that you could read. Or, if you’re already knowledgeable about astronomy, a book you might give to someone else who is smart and wants to know more about a topic they’ve always been interested in but hadn’t had much time to study. I wrote this book with busy folks in mind—teachers, police officers, politicians (maybe?), cab drivers, lawyers, doctors, librarians, musicians—pretty much anybody who wants to know more about astronomy, but didn’t really study it in school.

Now, while my name shows up on the front of the book, I couldn’t have done it without my group of background readers, mostly astronomers, who read drafts and gave me tremendously good feedback. I had only a couple of months to write the book, and so their honest opinions, error-checking, and moral support were incredibly helpful. Their names are listed in the front of the book as my “posse”, and I couldn’t have done it without them!

Check out the link at Amazon, give Astronomy 101 a pre-order and tell your friends that there’s a new astronomy book coming out they might want to check out! And, once you get it and have given it a read, let me know what you think. While one or two of my other books are about to go (or have gone) to eBook editions from their older print editions, this one is the first book I’ve done specifically for this hot new environment of electronic publishing, so I am anxious to see how it turns out.

 

 

 

 

The End of the Kepler Mission?

Not Yet, but Things Don’t Look Good

NASA’s Kepler spacecraft, launched in 2009 to search out worlds around other stars, has likely reached the end of its current mission due to the failure of a critical component called a reaction wheel. The spacecraft has four of these wheels which help stabilize Kepler so that it can point steadily at its assigned area of the sky. One of them failed last year, and this new failure now leaves the spacecraft with only two reaction wheels — an unstable (to put it mildly) and unworkable situation. Still, the mission team hasn’t given up. Until the problem can be corrected (and that’s not looking good), the spacecraft is what they call “Thruster-controlled Safe Mode”.

It’s a very disheartening day for the Kepler mission team, since they and their spacecraft have been SO successful in discovering new worlds and giving us a new feel for the population of planets in the Milky Way Galaxy. Of course, the mission has always had an anticipated end point, but I think that planners were hoping that day would come when the spacecraft ran out of thruster fuel. There’s a few months’ worth of fuel left, so they will keep working to solve the problem with the wheel.

Of course, Kepler’s discoveries don’t end with these problems. In fact, some of the most exciting results are still to come. The spacecraft’s light sensors have gathered so much data about distant stars and possible planets that it will be years before it is all analyzed.  Hidden in that data are many more distant planets.  So, Kepler’s mission isn’t quite over until the last planet is wrung out of the data.  Still, the mission will lose out on at least two years of further observations of planet candidates, and that WILL be a loss to the community.

Bill Borucki — the principal investigator of the Kepler team, while echoing the team’s concerns about the spacecraft, has pointed out that the mission has been wildly successful. He ended up his statements today (at a NASA telecon) by saying, “It’s been a long journey to prove Kepler would work, see it get rejected time and time again, go back and improve the proposals, and put it all together. So today, I am delighted with all Kepler has accomplished. It gave us data like no other mission ever has. I’m just elated with what we’ve accomplished. I’m not feeling sorry at all.”

This diagram compares the planets of the inner solar system to the five planets of Kepler-62, a star just two thirds the size of the sun and only one fifth as bright. Two of the planets, Kepler-62f and Kepler-62e, lie in the star's habitable zone. The planets shown are artist's depictions. Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech
This diagram compares the planets of the inner solar system to the five planets of Kepler-62, a star just two thirds the size of the sun and only one fifth as bright. Two of the planets, Kepler-62f and Kepler-62e, lie in the star’s habitable zone. The planets shown are artist’s depictions. Click to enlarge. Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech
Kepler-69 System Diagram compared the planets of the inner solar system. Kepler-69c is the smallest planet yet found in the habitable zone of a G-type sun-like star. Its 242-day orbit resembles that of our neighboring planet Venus. Planet Kepler-69b orbits every 13 days, nowhere near the habitable zone. The Kepler-69 planets shown are artist's concepts. Click to enlarge.  Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech.
Kepler-69 System Diagram. Kepler-69c is the smallest planet yet found in the habitable zone of a G-type sun-like star. Its 242-day orbit resembles that of planet Venus. Planet Kepler-69b orbits every 13 days, nowhere near the habitable zone. The planets shown are artist’s concepts. Click to enlarge.
Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech.

So, what has Kepler accomplished?  If you  browse the mission website, you can sample some of the many types of worlds the spacecraft has discovered. It has found 2,740 planet candidates so far and 2,165 eclipsing binary stars. Of the planetary candidates, 132 are confirmed as actual planets. Each of those worlds have unique characteristics that give tantalizing clues about how they formed and the star systems they inhabit. Just as an example, the stars called Kepler 62 and 69, are two quite different stars.

Kepler 62 is not sunlike, and has several planets that are somewhat larger than Earth and one the size of Mars. When these planets were announced in April, John Grunsfeld, associate administrator of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA, hailed the mission’s critical success. “The Kepler spacecraft has certainly turned out to be a rock star of science,” he said.

Today, Grunsfeld was a bit less upbeat, but still asserted that the Kepler mission isn’t dead—yet. I echo his thoughts and hope that the Kepler mission team can find a way around the spacecraft’s reaction wheel woes. I am reminded of the same issues that Hubble Space Telescope faced with its faulty gyros, which could be fixed by astronaut visits. Kepler doesn’t have that option because it orbits too far from Earth for a rescue mission. That distant orbit is what made this fantastic mission of planetary discovery possible. I wish the Kepler team all the best in finding a way to  make the spacecraft work a while longer.