Category Archives: cosmic chemistry

Before the Beginning

Comets As Probes of Pre-solar System History

When comets do a turn around the Sun, they leave behind streams of dust particles that Earth eventually intersects in its own orbit around the Sun. Most of the time we see these particles as they enter our atmosphere and burn up. It’s rare to get samples of these dusty bits, but when planetary scientists DO get them, they’ve basically gotten their hands on very old, very primitive bits of material that existed LONG before the Sun and planets did. This is because comets formed out of the materials in the protosolar nebula — essentially they’re orbiting deep-freezes of ice and dust.  Scientists have long known about comets and their treasure troves of ancient stuff.  In 2003, they managed to gather up good samples of Comet 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup and have been studying them since then.

Interplanetary dust particles showing pre-solar grains of silicates and organic matter that originated in interstellar space. Courtesy H. Busemann. Click to embiggenate.
Interplanetary dust particles showing pre-solar grains of silicates and organic matter that originated in interstellar space. Courtesy H. Busemann. (Click to embiggenate.)

The findings are amazing. According to Dr. Henner Busemann of the University of Manchester, who is presenting these results on Tuesday at the European Week of Astronomy and Space Science being held at University of Hertfordshire in the U.K., the dust grains have all the signs of being very ancient — predating the birth of the Sun and planets. Some of it is true stardust, floating in interstellar space after being ejected during the process of birth, life and death of other stars. “We found an extraordinary wealth of primitive chemical fingerprints,” he said, “including abundant pre-solar grains, true stardust that has formed around other earlier stars, some during supernova explosions, associated with extremely pristine organic matter that must pre-date the formation of our planets.”

You can see a sample of the dust particles here. They are extremely tiny — only a few thousands of a millimeter in diameter.   Two grains appear to have materials that scientists predict match the solar system’s birth nebula. One dust particle contained four pre-solar silicate grains (meaning grains that existed well before the solar system’s birth nebula formed) with an unusual chemical composition that matches the kinds of silicate grains that might form in supernova explosions. This is pretty good evidence that our birth nebula was seeded by the death throes of older, massive stars that once existed near our part of the galaxy.

More closeups of comet dust grains from the pre-solar-system neighborhood, more than 4.5 billion years ago. (Click to embiggenate.)
More closeups of comet dust grains from the pre-solar-system neighborhood, more than 4.5 billion years ago. (Click to embiggenate.)

One of these grains is a fragment of olivine and was found next to a hollow globule of carbon, most likely of interstellar origin. Carbon is an interesting element to find because it is intimately bound up in the structures that ultimately build life.

Organic coatings are suspected to be the shells of time capsules that protected and secured the survival of some of these fragile stellar silicate grains as they made their way through the interstellar environment and, later on, the high radiation environment of the newly forming Sun.

Detecting the Chemistry of Life

This isn’t the only big news coming from the WASS meeting.  Two researchers are also presenting a paper about the detection of two of the most complex molecules yet discovered in interstellar space: ethyl formate and n-propyl cyanide. Their computational models of interstellar chemistry also indicate that yet larger organic molecules may be present — including the so-far elusive amino acids, which are essential for life. The scientists used the IRAM 30-meter telescope in Spain to look at a region of the sky near the star-forming region Sagittarius B2.  The molecules were found in a hot, dense cloud of gas that also contains a newly formed star.

Large, organic molecules of many different sorts have been detected in this cloud in the past, including alcohols, aldehydes, and acids. The new molecules ethyl formate (C2H5OCHO) and n-propyl cyanide (C3H7CN) represent two different classes of molecule — esters and alkyl cyanides — and they are the most complex of their kind yet detected in interstellar space.

This is pretty cool news on both fronts. These findings by separate groups of scientists tell us that we (our planet and our star) came from some of the same processes we see happening throughout the galaxy.  The precursors of life are out there floating around in interstellar space, and scientists are finding more and more of them. It’s one thing to know and suspect these facts, but quite exciting to find evidence of our origins as part of the normal evolution of the universe and its stars and galaxies.

Searching for Life Elsewhere

The Chemistry of Life

Some years ago I wrote a documentary planetarium presentation called Oceans in Space. It’s about the search for life on other worlds. We made a big deal in the show about how life needs three things to survive: water, warmth, and organic material (food). That’s fine as far as it goes, but the devil is in the details when it comes to figuring out what ELSE life needs to exist.

Of course the criteria describe Earth’s environment, but they also very generally cover a number of possible life-supporting places NOT on our planet. But, just because a place might satisfy all three criteria doesn’t guarantee that it supports (or even has) life. The solar system has a number of worlds that have water and warmth and even some organic material to serve as “food” for life forms. Mars has many places that were once inundated with water. Some of the smaller icy water-rich moons of the outer solar system, such as Enceladus and Europa, could also support microbial life (if nothing else). But, so far we’ve found no evidence for life in these places, and in fact, there are many places on Earth where life doesn’t thrive. What do they have in common?

According to researchers at the University of Arizona, who have been chosen by NASA to focus on the criteria that will guide our future searches for life on other worlds, it’s possible that those places may lack enough chemical elements to support life.  So, while having water and warmth are a good start, if you don’t have the right chemical mix, it may be tough to start and sustain life.

Chemistry IS necessary for life, there’s no question about it. Last March I attended a seminar at Radcliffe Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the chemical origins of life were the main topic of conversation. (You can read the article I wrote about it here.) The message that “chemistry is life” was really forcefully brought home — and the details are fascinating.

The UA team (and its partners at the University of California, Riverside; University of California, Merced; Rice University and University of Illinois – Chicago, as well as NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the Australian Centre for Astrobiology at the University of New South Wales and the National Autonomous University of Mexico, under the direction of Dr. Ariel Anbar, plans to refine the criteria to guide the search for life by characterizing life’s elemental requirements. In other words, they’ll delve into the necessary chemistry that life needs to form and thrive.

The team will explore the relationship between the elemental composition of organisms and their environments, the impact of planetary processes on the abundance of bioessential elements, and the effects of astrophysical processes on the abundance of life-supporting elements. This is an important area of study for astrobiology and I look forward to seeing results from their work as time goes by.

**********
(Note: U.S. citizens —have you registered to vote?)