Category Archives: politics

politics, politics and nasa, politics and science

Find the NASA Budget

Leave a comment

GO ahead, I Dare You

In light of all the recent nattering and chattering about the NASA budget and how the sky is falling because Constellation got axed (never mind that it was underfunded under the previous administration and might not have flown in the next anyway), and how Americans are being denied their rightful place in space, or — even worse — how we’re spending SOOOO much on NASA that other programs aren’t being funded, I’d like to point everybody to a very nice page put together by the New York Times that shows you just how our projected $3.69 TRILLION U.S. budget is going to be spent. I might point out that under President Obama, the NASA budget is due for some increase in some areas — notably R&D and outreach, both places that could stimulate growth and jobs as NASA works to create sustainable growth while eventually getting us into space on a regular basis.

The U.S. budget, in graphical, easy-to-read form. Click to appropriate. Go to the Times link (highlighted in the text) for the interactive version. Courtesy New York Times.

Here’s a screen grab of the NYT graphical budget– go ahead and enlarge it. I want you to look at the lower right area, where I’ve highlighted a box in blue.  That box is where NASA fits in. Not everything in that box IS about NASA — just some of it. Then, look at the whole budget picture and think about what it says about our country’s commitment to science, techn0logy, and education — especially compared to everything else in the budget. I mean, NASA and NSF and other science funding is less than the agriculture line item (which includes outreach, education, and crop insurance).

Food for thought, folks. Food for thought.

NASA, politics, politics and nasa, politics and science

NASA’s Direction

2 Comments

The Wailing Begins

So,  NASA’s budget as revealed today is boosting basic research, “de-boosting” the Ares and Constellation programs, and putting the agency on a sensible path of sustained growth. How can this be a bad thing?  Well, if you’re a proponent of “get people into space no matter what”,  and “get NASA funding in my district whether it makes scientific sense or  not”, it’s a golden opportunity to yell about how our future in space is lost, NASA is dead, Obama’s un-American, etc. etc. ad nauseum.

I’d like to invite you to do something that some commentators have NOT YET done:  read the text of the NASA administrator’s remarks here to get the FULL story. Then you can see for yourself what all the shouting’s about.

Look, I’m all for getting humans into space, too. Hell, I want to go to space.  I expected to be living on the Moon in my retirement. So, I want to see that. But, I also know that the way we were going about it — based on George Bush’s grandiose visions, was not the way to go. I’m sure that the NASA folk employed by the Ares and Constellation programs have done fine work with what they had to do, but those missions are not where we should be going.

NASA needs a commitment to sustained R&D, reasonable steps forward to the Moon and beyond, and to retain its leadership status as the place that inspires people to dream big,w hether it’s about going to Mars, having a career in math and science, or making a contribution to something bigger than themselves. As I said in my posting yesterday, this country has a HUGE crisis in math and science education, something that other countries like China and India are beating us about the head and shoulders with. NASA has always been a huge engine of growth, leveraging its puny part of the federal government budget (less than 1 percent!) into marvelous technological progress and leverage to get more math and science education into our schools.

So, let’s stop the hand-wringing and pissing and moaning about the loss of Ares and Constellation and look at the big picture.  President Obama and NASA administrator Charles Bolden have done so. Instead of knee-jerk reactions, partisan pot-shots, and stupid headlines (“NASA Moon Mission Killed on Columbia Anniversary” (the tasteless hysterical and over-reacting headline from KBTX in College Station, TX — how could you??); pointless posturing commentary from Texas Republican Pete Olson (who, after all, has a narrow base to satisfy) who apparently can’t (or won’t) see the bigger picture, we need to look at this as a whole and see how it benefits ALL of American society — not just the parts of the country where there happen to be NASA bases.

You know, there might be a better way — and it’s possible that President Obama and his advisors HAVE actually looked into this carefully and are trying to get NASA and our science and technology establishment on a path to growth independent of pork barrel spending and campaign promises to narrow swatch of the voting public.  NASA’s promise is for ALL Americans and I wish that pundits and politicians would see that.

I’ll leave you with a quote from Dr. Bolden’s commentary this morning:

We both agreed that as NASA moves forward into this still-young century,
we need a renewed commitment to invention and development, to the creative
and entrepreneurial spirit that is at the core of our country’s character and that
these things would be good for NASA, great for the American workforce, and
essential for our nation’s future prosperity.