Black Hole: From Mathematics to Reality

A Mystery Solved

More than fifty years ago a mathematician named Roy Kerr began looking at weird theoretical beasts called “black holes”.  The idea of massive objects whose gravity is so high that nothing, not even light, can escape them, was not a new one in his time. But, they were considered theoretical, and nobody had observed one.  There were a lot of people who though they didn’t really exist.  Yet, there they were, theoretical objects that Albert Einstein and others suggested would have strange effects on space-time.

A NASA artist’s concept of a black hole surrounded by an accretion disk. The blue lines are magnetic field lines. Courtesy NASA.

Einstein had written equations that described the properties of static masses (which black holes were considered at the time).  He and others apparently thought they just hung there in space (if they existed at all). Some years later, astronomer Karl Schwarzschild found solutions to Einstein’s equations, but that didn’t bring black holes any closer to being discovered. That had to wait until we understood more about them.

We now know that black holes aren’t static. And, this is because Roy Kerr took another look at Einstein’s equations and worked with them under the assumption that black holes were actually rotating. He clarified that the size and shape of black holes could be described with two numbers: their masses and their rates of rotation. He worked with another scientist, Alfred Schild, and the two of them introduced the Kerr-Schild spacetime concept in 1965 that made it possible to understand (and look for) black holes. Not only did their work cover black holes, but it also applied to other massive (and weird) objects like neutron stars and compact binary star systems.

The gravitational lensing effect a black hole has on light that passes by from a more distant object (in this case, the simulation shows the Milky Way as a black hole passes between us and the more distant plane of our galaxy. (From UrbanLegend, Wikimedia Commons at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/
wiki/File:Black_hole_lensing_web.gif)

Today, we find black holes all over the place. They’re lurking in the hearts of galaxies as supermassive black holes. Some of these SMBHs (as they’re called) have the equivalent mass of millions or billions of Suns. Stellar-mass black holes (which form when very massive stars die in supernova explosions) exist throughout our galaxy. Understanding the effects of massive, rotating objects on nearby material allows astronomers to look for the radiation given off in the immediate vicinity of a black hole as interstellar material (gas, dust, stars) funnels in.  A black hole also warps space-time, producing a lensing effect on light that passes near the cosmic beast.

Our own Milky Way Galaxy has a black hole at its heart. It’s called Sagittarius A*, and it contains about the same mass as four million Suns. Astronomers are still studying this black hole and others to understand how they form at the hearts of galaxies. There is evidence of a smaller black hole in the vicinity of Sagittarius A*. Could it be heading toward a union with the larger black hole?  No one’s sure yet, but it’s an intriguing idea.

Today, some 50 years after Kerr’s work opened the door to black hole understanding, astronomers are honoring him at a conference in Warsaw, Poland called the 20th International Conference on General Relativity Theory and Gravitation. It’s a fitting honor for a man whose work solved, literally and figuratively, the mystery behind the once-theoretical black holes.

Pluto’s Moons Get Names

P4 and P5 Get Their Official Names

In modern times, the honor of suggesting names for celestial objects is rightfully reserved for the person or persons who discover them. They send their list of names to the International Astronomical Union, which has the job of certifying the suggested names. A committee at the IAU checks to make sure the names aren’t already taken, that they fit whatever naming scheme may be in place for the category of objects, and then if everything checks out, they approve the names. The actual discoverers can use whatever means they like to come up with names. Some objects, such as Venus, have naming schemes that dictate the types of names that can be chosen. In Venus’s case, features are named after prominent women, goddess names, etc.  Other objects, such as exoplanets, don’t have naming schemes beyond the current practice of using the name of the star and alphabet letters to designate a given planet. The Uwingu group has been busily compiling lists of popularly chosen names for exoplanet discoverers to use if they like.

The Pluto system with its newly named moons Styx and Kerberos. Courtesy SETI Institute.

Popular naming came into play when two new moons were discovered orbiting the dwarf planet Pluto. They were quickly designated P4 and P5, and the team that discovered had the privilege of suggesting permanent names. The team, led by astronomer Mark Showalter, a senior research scientist at the SETI Institute, decided to have the Institute run a public naming contest called Pluto Rocks. People could send in whatever names they felt were appropriate, and the contest then forwarded the most popular names for consideration to the IAU.

Yesterday the SETI Institute announced that the IAU had formally approved the  names Kerberos for P4 and Styx, for P5. These fit well with the mythological status of Pluto as the guardian of the underworld. In Greek mythology, Kerberos is a three-headed dog who guards the entrance to Hades (the underworld), while Styx is the river that separates Hades from the world of the living.

Pluto is gaining increasing attention as the New Horizons spacecraft gets closer to its 2015 goal of exploring this intriguing system that lies in the far reaches of the solar system. Certainly Pluto’s moons will come under intense scrutiny, and the spacecraft could discover more moons too small to see even with Hubble’s sharp eye.

Exploring Science and the Cosmos

Spam prevention powered by Akismet