How far is Up?

And other Interesting Questions

I just returned from a trip where I gave five astronomy presentations, followed by Q&A sessions.  It’s always a revelation to hear people’s questions about space and astronomy.  I thought I’d share them with you, plus some answers.

How far is up?

Mucho laughter ensued when that one was asked, because it really sounds like a silly question. But, it’s not. And it’s a question that’s not substantially different (in meaning) from “How far is out?”

In one sense, “up” and “out” end at the observable limits of the universe.  At this point, that’s the time right after the Big Bang when the “cosmic dark ages” ended and the first stars began to shine, maybe 13.3 or so billion years ago.

Perhaps the questioner was wondering how far it was to the edge of space from Earth’s surface?  Well, do you mean the limit of the observable universe? Or, perhaps the place in space where Earth’s atmosphere ends and “space” begins?  If so, then some calculations suggest that it begins at about 100 kilometers above the surface, although the atmosphere really still exists out to just under 1,000 kilometers. That’s where I’d consider the “edge of space” to be.

According to my friend Phil Erickson, at MIT’s Haystack Observatory, the atmosphere itself ends at the level of something called the “geocorona”. This is a region where all that is left is of our atmosphere is a collection of neutral/ionized hydrogen atoms. Here, the  “mean free path” of a particle — that is, the average distance covered by a moving particle, atom, photon, etc. between successive impacts with other particles — is so long that collisions don’t happen very frequently and the particles are on ballistic trajectories through space.  Depending on the season, the part of the solar cycle we’re in, the temperature, and other factors, the geocorona can begin anywhere from 500 to 800 kilometers.

How do supermassive black holes in galaxy cores get started?

That’s a good one. One theory is that perhaps a stellar black hole begins to swallow up more and more material — getting more massive as it does. Eventually, after millions and millions of years, a supermassive black hole results.  Another idea is that perhaps a cluster of stellar black holes merge to become one big supermassive one.  Astronomers don’t have a single formation scenario worked out yet, but they will, especially as they study galaxy evolution at different epochs in cosmic history. Galaxy evolution and supermassive black holes seem to be connected in many ways.

Can comets suck water away from Mars and

could that explain where all the water on Mars went?

Wow. That’s ingenious.  But, as much as we’d like to know exactly WHERE Mars’s water went and how the planet lost its atmosphere, the idea that a comet could suck out tons and tons of water from a planet isn’t correct.  Look at the physics of the situation: comets are chunks of ices, not very large and certainly don’t have the gravitational pull to suck water from a planet.  It’s more likely that Mars’s gravitational pull could have caused a comet or several to swerve into the surface in the past. But, not the other way around.

How much does it cost to be an astronomer?

A lot.  College costs a lot, graduate school costs more.  But, the price depends on the schools one attends.  Mentally and physically, it’s stimulating work, and if you go at it with the right attitude, the intangible costs are far outweighed by the rewards of discovery and knowledge.

To the folks who attended my talks in the past couple of weeks — it was a pleasure to meet you and share astronomy!  Keep looking up!

Finding a Habitable Planet

Not Too Far Away

An artist's concept by Lynette Cook of the planet found around Gliese 581.

The news of a new planet only three times the size of Earth and orbiting in its star’s potentially habitable zone spurs on the great speculation that it’s only a matter of time before we find a planet with some sort of life on it.

The star is called Gliese 581, a red dwarf that lies only 20 light-years from Earth. The planet is called Gliese 581g. This discovery was the result of more than a decade of observations using the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawai’i.

Finding a planet in a potentially habitable zone means that the planet lies in an orbit around the star that is just far enough away (but not too far away) that liquid water could exist on the planet’s surface.  That water hasn’t yet been found on the Gliese 581g, but the fact that it’s in the right place — the so-called “Goldilocks zone” is important.

Water is one of the prime ingredients for life, along with warmth and organic material.  If water is eventually found on the newly discovered planet, that would make it the most Earth-like exoplanet yet discovered and the first strong case for a potentially habitable one.  To astronomers, a “potentially habitable” planet is one that could sustain life, not necessarily one where humans would thrive.  Having habitable status depends  on more than just water and an atmosphere, but those two factors really raise the odds of the planet being hospitable to life.

So, how did astronomers find this planet?  The research is based on 11 years of observations of Gliese 581 using the HIRES spectrometer on the Keck I Telescope. That instrument lets astronomers make precise measurements of a star’s radial velocity (its motion along the line of sight from Earth). Changes in that radial velocity might indicate that something is tugging on the star, inducing slight changes in its motion in space.  The gravitational influence of an orbiting planet is one reason why we might see periodic changes in the radial velocity of a host star. Multiple planets induce complex wobbles in the star’s motion, and astronomers use sophisticated analyses to detect planets and determine their orbits and masses.

NO Intelligent Life.. or Any Life… Yet

As you might expect, some commentators and reporters in the media and Web-based React-O-Sphere are already breathlessly reporting the discovery of life on that planet.   It isn’t so.  Hasn’t been found. Yet.  The discovery is of a “potentially habitable planet” not an inhabited one. There’s a distinct difference when you stop to think about it.

But, that hasn’t stopped the React-O-Sphere from saying it.  It tells me that those commentators either didn’t read the press releases carefully or didn’t understand them.  This story is a great case for the value of reading comprehension on the part of the media and Web commentators.

For the straight scoop on what HAS been found, check out the link at the top, or go here or here.  That way you can get more of the story — straight from the sources who made the discovery.

Exploring Science and the Cosmos

Spam prevention powered by Akismet